03-23-2012, 12:20 PM
Gary,
I realize that as moderator you have your hands full and also want to make your poiunts, just like the rest of us. We do not have to agree to be brothers. Now look at that last sentence! Do you see hwo it sounds like it is saying that we are not going to agree to be brothers, when instead what it meant was that we could be brothers even if we do not agree? If I had not picked up on this and left it that way that could easily have been taken as an insult and caused you to respond negatively inciting confusion.
I had laready respondrd to your other thread before reading this post, but I will say that I am defintley not getting my concerns voiced the way that I would like to. And I really don't know whow to say these things any differently than I already have except to say that what GWV said pretty much nailed it for me. I wonder if I can hire him to be my translator?
Anyway gary you state here :Yet I’m somewhat baffled that such a confusion still persists given that a) the material on which this community is founded is freely available for reading and study, and, b) members have made great effort to communicate what polarity means in their understanding.
This is true however I tell you that this information is being misinterpreted by some in a dnagerous way. It has been revealed to me through many discussions here. But as you have all so eagerly made clear, this community does not tolerate those who come here to bring a message of concern. It is considered bad manners and unwelcome. I will comply with that as it is your authority to set such guidelines. And so I will just have to rest on the knowledge that I have made my concern public and now let it takes its course. I do apologize for having violated the communitie's comfort guidelines and zones.
The intention was not malicious, even though it may have been ignorant of those policies.
I realize that as moderator you have your hands full and also want to make your poiunts, just like the rest of us. We do not have to agree to be brothers. Now look at that last sentence! Do you see hwo it sounds like it is saying that we are not going to agree to be brothers, when instead what it meant was that we could be brothers even if we do not agree? If I had not picked up on this and left it that way that could easily have been taken as an insult and caused you to respond negatively inciting confusion.
I had laready respondrd to your other thread before reading this post, but I will say that I am defintley not getting my concerns voiced the way that I would like to. And I really don't know whow to say these things any differently than I already have except to say that what GWV said pretty much nailed it for me. I wonder if I can hire him to be my translator?
Anyway gary you state here :Yet I’m somewhat baffled that such a confusion still persists given that a) the material on which this community is founded is freely available for reading and study, and, b) members have made great effort to communicate what polarity means in their understanding.
This is true however I tell you that this information is being misinterpreted by some in a dnagerous way. It has been revealed to me through many discussions here. But as you have all so eagerly made clear, this community does not tolerate those who come here to bring a message of concern. It is considered bad manners and unwelcome. I will comply with that as it is your authority to set such guidelines. And so I will just have to rest on the knowledge that I have made my concern public and now let it takes its course. I do apologize for having violated the communitie's comfort guidelines and zones.
The intention was not malicious, even though it may have been ignorant of those policies.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)