03-21-2012, 06:55 PM
Of course. As a facetious post i will give a facetious example.
The person that becomes enraged when the parking spot they were waiting on is swiped rudely. In a moment of SELF service he rams the other car. Now, because of our chosen angle of perception we get uptight about this action. But if we look into the Law in effect we find that an auto manufacturer is served with a bit of job security filling the need for another car, the insurance agent is being served by filling a need, and the owner of the car that was rammed got a replacement car for the "lemon" they were unable to sell or afford to replace.
Even the parking spot swiper was acting in a moment of selfishness. But with those around us that keep harmony behind the scenes, they all work together to bring our free will to manifestation.
Then think about which angle of perception is of more use? Ther perp or the victim?
I root for those behind the scenes. Guides need job security too. I find disharmony comes from trting to take control away from our guides.
The person that becomes enraged when the parking spot they were waiting on is swiped rudely. In a moment of SELF service he rams the other car. Now, because of our chosen angle of perception we get uptight about this action. But if we look into the Law in effect we find that an auto manufacturer is served with a bit of job security filling the need for another car, the insurance agent is being served by filling a need, and the owner of the car that was rammed got a replacement car for the "lemon" they were unable to sell or afford to replace.
Even the parking spot swiper was acting in a moment of selfishness. But with those around us that keep harmony behind the scenes, they all work together to bring our free will to manifestation.
Then think about which angle of perception is of more use? Ther perp or the victim?
I root for those behind the scenes. Guides need job security too. I find disharmony comes from trting to take control away from our guides.
