12-11-2009, 03:53 PM
(12-11-2009, 01:28 PM)Lavazza Wrote: Honestly, I have no idea what convinced me, or even continues to convince me. I know many people who would shrug the Law of One philosophy completely, but for some reason I feel very close to it.
Interesting. I've always been deeply skeptical of any work that claims communication with aliens or other paranormal events as being anything more than fantasy or misinterpretation.
Granted there are a handful of UFO cases that are extremely compelling (the 1957 RB-47 case, '56 Lakenheath-Bentwaters, '86 flight JAL-1628, the 80's Hudson valley UFO flap, etc), but without radar data or a large sampling of people all corroborating the event it's hard to say whether the person simply misidentified what they were seeing or if it is as they claim.
Then add the statistic that 9 out of 10 sightings are misidentifications and it's easy to see why I'm highly dubious of people claiming communication with other lifeforms. This kind of thinking makes it very difficult for me to accept the Law of One regardless of how well it meshes with my own weird experience.
Quote:I've always been an idealist I suppose, and the notion of all things, people and beliefs as valid in their own right is both appealing and elegant to me.
I'm fairly similar. I've often wondered why people become so adamant about their single particular ideology, so much so that they'd go out and kill people over it. To me it's always seemed like all beliefs have their time and place and to varying degrees.
Quote: I still haven't written up my 'wanderer' story, maybe it's about time I do so (although I am uncertain as to my status as a wanderer).
I'd be curious to read it. For me it's the sheer number of coincidences that makes me say, "Well it all fits." It's just hard to believe.
Quote:The information you posted above looks very interesting, although I haven't had time to read it. Will do so soon.
I'd love to hear your thoughts on it once you given it read through.
Cheers!