03-13-2012, 04:03 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-13-2012, 04:05 PM by Steppingfeet.)
Ankh, I'm sorry but you don't get the member-of-the-month parking spot. Those don't count. = )
I came close to referring to quotes like those. I thought about addressing Ra's uses of correct/incorrect, right/wrong in my own post, but opted not to as I attempted/hoped to cover the base with the underlined portion in this sentence:
"But from the standpoint of the Law of One, that which "blinks neither at the light nor the darkness", there is ultimately no such thing as right/wrong, just the Creator interacting with the Creator -- with more or less distortion."
I think (and could be... well... wrong) that from the standpoint of the Law of One, there is no right or wrong, as Ra said in an already quoted statement.
Within limited contexts, there certainly is "right" and "wrong".
From the unlimited standpoint of the Law of One, there, according to the Law of One Material, can be no right/wrong.
This may be a topic suited for better minds than mine.
GLB
I came close to referring to quotes like those. I thought about addressing Ra's uses of correct/incorrect, right/wrong in my own post, but opted not to as I attempted/hoped to cover the base with the underlined portion in this sentence:
"But from the standpoint of the Law of One, that which "blinks neither at the light nor the darkness", there is ultimately no such thing as right/wrong, just the Creator interacting with the Creator -- with more or less distortion."
I think (and could be... well... wrong) that from the standpoint of the Law of One, there is no right or wrong, as Ra said in an already quoted statement.
Within limited contexts, there certainly is "right" and "wrong".
From the unlimited standpoint of the Law of One, there, according to the Law of One Material, can be no right/wrong.
This may be a topic suited for better minds than mine.

Explanation by the tongue makes most things clear, but love unexplained is clearer. - Rumi