An Emotive View of STO vs. STS

[godwide_void]

The predominate problematic factor with this whole STO vs. STS business is the common tendency amongst several members here to seemingly over-conceptualize and compartmentalize these concepts. It is not rocket science; these terms were chosen by Ra and both 'paths' were deemed equally valid due to their having transcended polarity in the highly evolved state of being they hold at their current nexus. It is necessary to filter these terms so as to better apply them to our world, and when this is done the following definitions apply:

GV, why would you want to, and why would we ever need to, bring "closure" on a topic that we may mine with great benefit for the remainder of our incarnation? The "choice", as the Confederation calls it, is the "axis on which the creation turns".

That's a pretty big deal, involving not just this incarnation alone, but our journey for a long, long, loooong time to come. : )

Our understanding of polarity, our definitions of polarity, our discussions of polarity, our experience of polarity will evolve as we evolve. We will be faced with the endlessly complex and dynamic possibilities of polarity with each new turn of the upward moving spiral.

How in the world could there be closure, or finality, or nailing it all down to, "Look, it's this way. Case closed."

Much love, GLB

You're absolutely right. "Truth" is not an immovable absolute, it is always in flux, evolving, resulting in new revelations arising each and every day. What I attempted to do was place the general concepts of STO and STS in a much better perspective, no, not a "better" perspective, moreso a view of it which "holds more water" so to speak in the density we find ourselves in. There are an infinite variety of ways any topic may be approached and articulated, Icaro for example approaches the polarities while keeping in mind which chakra is being primarily utilized and a more metaphysical view of it. My approach to STO vs STS tries to convey a more emotive slant. Both approaches are true, albeit focusing upon different aspects of it. So yes, there may never be closure on the discussion of polarity, because who knows? Polarity itself may one day change (next octave, perhaps), thus calling for a whole new slew of definitions, discussions, experiences and understanding thereof!

Gary (am I entitled to call you Gary, GLB?), do you think that "An Emotional View of STO vs. STS" would be a more appropriate thread title?

The terming of the choice we make here being momentary but "the axis on which the Creation turns" evoked plenty of imagery and insight for me upon reading. Indeed, it's mindblowing to think that one small moment we use in our incarnation to consciously determine "I want to walk the path of Light/Dark", that small moment will completely determine the ENTIRETY of our remaining experience of the Creation. Every bit of catalyst and scenario we undergo uses our choice and will as the foundation.

---

we came here to be bound by flesh and found in the end. creator blinded itself temporarily...

This may be so for Wanderers, but for those of us experiencing 3rd density for the first time, it's another mater.

No, I'm sure the same applies for Earth sphere natives as well. Being bound by the flesh and subjected to the material illusion is a staple of 3rd Density incarnation in this world, and indeed there is no "prerequisite" of being a Wanderer to be afforded the opportunity to happen upon awareness of the truth of ones nature as Creator in this place. All come to experience, all stay to learn, all eventually choose, all inevitably return to the One.