03-10-2012, 05:26 PM
(03-10-2012, 04:52 PM)ShinAr Wrote: To be honest, I was just trying to be diplomatic about his evasion of the question. best to let it go when it reaches that point, right? Not sure what you find funny about the topic though. May I ask if english is your second language? Sometimes that creates problems.
If you read through that thread you will see 3DMonkey's opinion, which he expresses in that thread very well.
We've had these discussions before. It's not the first one, and it's not the last one either. And I believe that you've already heard that before, from abridgetoofar in another thread. That is what I found amusing.
You are correct in that English is not my native language.
Shin'Ar Wrote:So in this second here and now, if you confronted a rapist attacking a woman in an alley, would you see yourself in him?
No.
Shin'Ar Wrote:Would you see the Creator in him?
No.
Shin'Ar Wrote:Would you allow him to continue becasue you would not want to infringe upon his free will?
No.
Shin'Ar Wrote:If not rape, where would you fraw the line?
Rape will do just fine, otherwise any form of physical abuse will do just fine too.
Shin'Ar Wrote:Basically, in that second of time would you agree that STS would not be a tolerable path to follow?
You keep saying that we are defending it, or supporting it. What I am trying to do is accepting it, as it is a tool of an entity who is trying to polarize in service to others. However, we are in third density, and I have my 49% to use as free cards so to speak. So I will stop any entity, if I am able, from abusing another self. What I and 3DMonkey are trying to tell you though, is that it is *not* a STO act. It is a STS act.