My Thoughts On STS

[Ankh]

Ankh,

You say that this is the only place that you have found teachings about the One that have 'met with your understandings of it'. I wonder why that is?

I said that the Ra material is finally, after 19 years of searching and seeking (=meaning that I went through quite a pile of other teachings and was tired if dissonance), was something that I resonated with. I cried among other things. I finally found something that felt like home again.

Q'uo, Sunday Meditation 2008_0322

Your path of resonance is unique. No matter how wise your teacher or how inspired the writing, there is almost no chance that everything a given teacher or writer offers to you as food for thought will resonate to you. Ideally, those concepts which you follow will be those concepts which, when first read or heard, awaken within a seeker a kind of recollection as though he already knew that but was happy to be reminded of it once again.

And the constant use of Ra quotes taken out of their true context is not a deterent either. It may fool many, but it does not fool those wise to the manipulation, whether innocent or deliberate.

Here is an awesome site, Shin'Ar: www.lawofone.info. When you come to the first page, there is a little box to your left there, where it says: "Search the Law of One Sessions". In that box you can click on match either by "any word", or "all words", or "exact phrase". I usually provide the link to the whole session I am quoting of Ra/Q'uo, but am perhaps sloppy at times, or forgetting that. Anyway, when you see a quote "taken out of their true context" you can search for that specific session on that site, and offer us your understanding of it. The Law of One material is always welcomed to be discussed on this board.

I do not speak out to gain anything for myself and I certainly do not speak out to fall into one of the two categories of STO or STS that just about every single enetity in this forum does. Is that all that you have gained from the lessons that Ra has spoken?

You can categorize me based on that degree of understanding if you choose to do so, and I really do not care which category you place me in.

I am sorry to hear that you took my words as for categorizing you as STS, my brother. It was *not* my intention. The service to others path is a straight and narrow path to walk, and I am learning.

What I offered in my other post to you is my understanding that when you serve the other self in the way that *you* find it to be best and right for that other self, you cease to be of service to that person. And I do *not* mean it as to say that you are service to self oriented.

If you have the interest and time, please do read that FREE WILL thread that I was referring to in my previous post. I would welcome any discussions in that thread, as I believe that concept to be a number one understanding when walking the service to others path, but I have nothing to add to that thread, as it contains so much information that is rich in itself.

There is no service to myself, in this regard, for I do not look back to see how many are following me.

That's great, my brother. A detachment to the outcome when service to others is being offered, is what the Free Will distortion is about.

I do not call on them for anything at all. I see them as my tail. The part of me that was, is coming along behind the rest of me, as my Body. I am a Light, and nothing else. The saving is done by those who follow. They save themselves by following the Light, instead of walking into the darkness.

I would rather see that each little portion of intelligence, no matter how small or big, would turn on its own light. Those who like my/your light may come to that light and get to know it; and that is our service to others - to share the love and the light of our One Infinite Creator. And maybe some will find the inspiration to lit their own light, and that is when magic happens. When someone turns on its own light and start shining with its own unique beauty. Each light is of infinite worth.

I attempted to make itr perfectly clear that no insult was meant, and note that Ankh has not responded as though she took it that way. What I meant by the remark was that it was so profound that the extent of it was probably not realized.

Sometimes I do not respond to the posts because I can't see in what way I can be of service to that other self. Avoiding unnecessary conflicts and yapping is then more important to me than responding to the post, where I can not be of service anyway. I appologize if you took it as an insult, and I promise to better my behavior from now on, and each time another self addresses me try to respond to that. However, after my initial post where I was just sharing my thoughts, you did not addressed me directly, therefore I saw no need to respond to you. It was not done because I lacked the respect for you.

Wew all know what she meant by it. My remark was that it was far more critical to the truth of the discussion than anything else that has been said.

I can offer my understanding and explanation to why I wrote as I wrote, and what exactly I meant, if that will be your wish, but I wonder, could you please do me a service and offer your own understanding of what you think that I meant?