Ra material is not the Law of One

[Steppingfeet]

Shin'Ar, I think this is a helpful distinction to make between the actual Law of One, and the Law of One material. (I try to remember to add the word "material" when referring to the books.)

What you've noted seems like such a self-evident truth, but unless it's pointed out by the self or another, it can easily go unnoticed, and the mind can make an equivalency between the Ra information and the living reality of the Law of One that is the essential experience of who we really are.

In addition to the wonderful excerpts Ankh shared from Ra, I'll add this one:

4.20 "The Law of One, though beyond the limitations of name, as you call vibratory sound complexes, may be approximated by stating that all things are one, that there is no polarity, no right or wrong, no disharmony, but only identity. All is one, and that one is love/light, light/love, the Infinite Creator."

Ra echoes the opening lines of the Tao te Ching, which, in this particular translation, goes:

"The tao that can be told
is not the eternal Tao
The name that can be named
is not the eternal Name.

The unnamable is the eternally real.
Naming is the origin
of all particular things."