Ra material is not the Law of One

[Ankh]

Ankh, we are in agreement that the Law of One is found in many teachings around the world.

This is what I said:

My personal understanding is that it is up to each intelligence to use whatever catalysts it finds appropriate or suitable for its own learn/teachings. The Ra material may be but one of the many teach/learnings to study, understand and to progress towards the One Infinite Creator. The Ra material may be but one of many teach/learnings towards understanding of the Law of One.

I do not understand your problem with my calling us, all who follow these teachings, as Children of the Law of One.

if you have a problem with that and choose to define yourself by some other means that is none of my business at all. And if you are bais toward the Ra material, than I assume that means that you are making some distinguishment between the Law of One as taught through it and the Law of One taught elsewhere.

Understanding of any teaching is always a matter of discernment and your prerogative. But I shall continue to refer to all who follow the teaching of the Law of One wheerver it is found, as Children of the Law of One, including yourself.

This is what you said in your first post to which I was responding:

The Law of One is found in various cultures and ancient teachings and those who are aware of it and follow its guiding principles can be known as the Children of the Law of One.

However there are many who are aware of it, and know it, but who do not follow it and deliberately choose to be in opposition to it. Those would not be Children of the Law of One.

Of how you choose to see other selves, is your choice. This is what Ra said in the matter of how to view other selves:

Ra: The universe is one being. When a mind/body/spirit complex views another mind/body/spirit complex, see the Creator.

The title of the thread was to point out that the Ra material is not the Law of One, it is a teaching of the Law of One. The Law of One exists despite the ability of Ra to teach it. It exists as the Law of One just as the Law of gravity exists. If Ra taught the Law of gravity to you I would also be able to say that the Ra material is not the law of gravity. Would you be bias toward the law of garvity as taught by Ra over it as taught by Newton or Einstein? I am not sure what your concern is.

I do not have any concerns, and have already addressed your thoughts in two previous posts. Whatever catalyst or tool you find helpful for your path, is your choice. As someone stated in this very thread, his dog has taught him the Law of One. So whatever works, dude.