02-26-2012, 11:08 AM
Ankh, we are in agreement that the Law of One is found in many teachings around the world.
I do not understand your problem with my calling us, all who follow these teachings, as Children of the Law of One.
if you have a problem with that and choose to define yourself by some other means that is none of my business at all. And if you are bais toward the Ra material, than I assume that means that you are making some distinguishment between the Law of One as taught through it and the Law of One taught elsewhere.
Understanding of any teaching is always a matter of discernment and your prerogative. But I shall continue to refer to all who follow the teaching of the Law of One wheerver it is found, as Children of the Law of One, including yourself.
The title of the thread was to point out that the Ra material is not the Law of One, it is a teaching of the Law of One. The Law of One exists despite the ability of Ra to teach it. It exists as the Law of One just as the Law of gravity exists. If Ra taught the Law of gravity to you I would also be able to say that the Ra material is not the law of gravity. Would you be bias toward the law of garvity as taught by Ra over it as taught by Newton or Einstein? I am not sure what your concern is.
I do not understand your problem with my calling us, all who follow these teachings, as Children of the Law of One.
if you have a problem with that and choose to define yourself by some other means that is none of my business at all. And if you are bais toward the Ra material, than I assume that means that you are making some distinguishment between the Law of One as taught through it and the Law of One taught elsewhere.
Understanding of any teaching is always a matter of discernment and your prerogative. But I shall continue to refer to all who follow the teaching of the Law of One wheerver it is found, as Children of the Law of One, including yourself.
The title of the thread was to point out that the Ra material is not the Law of One, it is a teaching of the Law of One. The Law of One exists despite the ability of Ra to teach it. It exists as the Law of One just as the Law of gravity exists. If Ra taught the Law of gravity to you I would also be able to say that the Ra material is not the law of gravity. Would you be bias toward the law of garvity as taught by Ra over it as taught by Newton or Einstein? I am not sure what your concern is.