Greetings from the Dark

[Ankh]

That being said, for the time being I am in a STO orientation.

I believe that *each* time you shift your polarity, you *actually* shift your polarity. How can you, in the logical sense, polarize in service to self, when you shift *that* very service? Doesn't make any rational sense to me...

Chiming in here even though the question wasn't asked to me...

You're essentially asking "How can one shift polarity back and forth in one lifetime and not lose contact with the roots of their being?" right?

Hello brother. I just now realized that you were addressing to me. =)

What I asked is something that I've already stated in ahktu's thread about STO/STS meditation, but can reiterate it here: I wished to explore the details of my own understanding of the polarity, as I believe that either Zaxon is not polarized enough to be harvested, or that I must have misinterpreted something in the concepts of the polarity, in which case I wished to explore this mis-/understanding. I developed my understanding in that mentioned thread.

So, here's my working theory. You could say that polarity is the amount of self discovered/developed from the unconscious mind (unmanifested self) and utilized towards service in one direction or the other. If one's unmanifested self is of love (for example 4th density positive wanderer), then, generally, one would discover the unmanifested self, as it is made manifest through the use of catalyst, as one of unconditional love, and polarize thusly. So, what if one is of 6th density? You discover the potential for both... And 6th density wanderers polarize, yet their social memory complex moves forward in evolution away from polarization. Somehow, there is the potential for massive polarization without it steering the course of evolution of the complex.

I can only conclude that polarity is the ability held in the present moment to perform service with the creator's light, based on the potentials contained within the unmanifested self, and drawn forth within that lifetime by the entity's conscious will.

Thank you for offering your understanding. I agree with you that third density is the density where work in consciousness is done.

As to the sixth density goes, remember that there is a big difference between third density and fourth density already, and Ra had difficulties to put it in words, and also said that as higher up it goes it becomes more and more difficult to describe it til they become without words. We can not understand what it means to be a sixth density being in our current state, as we are not sixth density beings in our mind/body complex. But Ra said that this density is not of understanding, but of choice. Making a choice and/or further refinement of that choice. The polarity concept stops in mid sixth density, yes, but Wanderers returning to third density do not return to depolarize, but to polarize further, more, and it applies to both of those of positive orientation as of negative.

Perhaps what you mean is to not develop a bias of what you approve and disapprove? For Law of One sees an entity who is serving the self in exactly the same manner as an entity who is serving others. Perhaps this understanding, the understanding of the Law of One, is what you wished to convey? To bear no judgement, but accepting all as the illusion it is, in order to understand yourself/it, and then move forward? I personally love that part of the material! But it also stated there that the Higher Self will continue to feed you with catalysts until you develop a bias. Choose your personal path of walking.

If taking this density and all that it means to be here, then I have developed a bias one can say. This bias is: I believe in One Creator, and One Creator only. This oneness is beyond human apprehension, thus human mind may distort it in various ways, by, among other things, religious systems. But I, who believe in One Infinite Creator, don't see that Creator as separated from me or others, but in all things and all beings. It is unity.

Sometimes, like now, we may also loose ourselves in technicalities such as this one, and put way to much attention to the details, not seeing the bigger picture. After all, this is the density of confusion. But when I personally need to clear my mind of thoughts of this confusion, or when I need to see this bigger picture, there is one question I always ask myself when being in this density, living in this world, living the life I am living; and the answer to that question puts me personally right back on track. The question is: where would I be myself, if it would not for the dedication to service to others path, of those known as Carla L. Rueckert, Don Elkins and Jim McCarty?