David Wilcock

[Peregrinus]

I feel compelled to attempt to make a salient point as regards the LOO. The Ra material per se is not the Law of One. It is an attempt (albeit the best we have in modern times to summarize) to express something of the Law of One, yet the Law of One is something eternal and unchanging since the first distortion of the one infinite intelligence.

Agreed, though I believe the Ra Materials do give us as concise a meaning of the LOO as can be understood with our use of vibratory complex of sound.

1.5 Ra: You are every thing, every being, every emotion, every event, every situation. You are unity. You are infinity. You are love/light, light/love. You are. This is the Law of One.

What of one who has resonated with the core message, and found that this marvelous body of work bespeaks that which is already felt and accessible at the larger intuitive core of being which has a history of living the LOO and is already expressing the LOO in every day life?

This mind/body/spirit complex of which you speak is most likely a wanderer.

To sceptics who question another's scholarly qualifications to speak of aspects of the LOO, I suggest again that the LOO is no more in the province of the Scholar, anymore than it is in the province of some simple maiden or gent living the Law, yet who has never heard of it - yet approaches the world with love and the desire to share and promote love and outward service as per their own native calling.

One who rises on his own solitary initiative, in love and attempts to spread and multiply unconditional love and a rare (on this ginormous interweb ) positive view of our collective predicament directed to as wide an audience as possible despite their human frailties and warts and imperfections will do more good for our common cause - provided they can withstand the tide of inevitable depolarisation attempts - than those who endlessly quibble with and promote their intellectual fine points and attempt to undermine, (perhaps inadvertantly) a great cause.

What, I may ask certain detractors, have you done which approaches DW's great effort to appeal to the collective human family, in the way of direct appeal to love via the incalculable resource of the internet?

As David has purposely appealed to the full gamut of seekers; from the early awakening to issues of the neg intrigue and doom and gloom (of which there are millions, I can tell you!) to those who are ready to shed themselves of the sense of worldly intrigue and bottomless mystery, he to me represents a current champion in the ways of appealing to our collective yet infinitely varied state of being. Many will feel rightfully that he doesn't resonate, but millions may potentially resonate, and be prompted to try on the lens of intuitive gut feeling of the message of the man, and come perhaps eventually to the written encapsulation (or gut instinctive, intuitional apprehension) of the Law of One. 'Scholarship' is a very minor consideration, in light of all.

In truth there is no right or wrong. Each upon this plane has their own work to do, so asking what each does in comparison to another is pointless and fruitless. I believe you were championing David, but I do not believe it is needed.... I only speak for myself in that I truly appreciate David's stellar (pun intended) work and devotion to enlightening others. He does a remarkable job, and he has my admiration and support. I would not be where I am (intellectually and spiritually) today were it not for him. Please bear in mind that those wanderers which are from the 6th density have already acquired wisdom, and thus if the forgetting is pierced, this is one avenue which is open to involvement. This is not good or bad or right or wrong. It just is.

As for moi, many of you know me as a senior mod on David's forum. As David is attemping a great outreach to the totality of the community of seekers and beyond, he is bound to get on his forum a huge amount of neg stuff. Much of our stringent mod policies erupt in answer to the fact that we try to maintain a positive gathering of LOO based spirituality.

The huge influx of truly negative and demeaning posts requires of us that we be rather strict as to the deluge of negativity. Many have expressed dismay, rightfully so, and yet it is not you to whom we speak.

Those who wish to detract are very many - and so to be fair to all, certain guidelines are enforced across the board, only with a mind to maintain a level playing field, and to keep out the tides of serious negative comment. When addressing such a large cross-section of seeking humanity, there is so much negative imput that mod policies need to maintain an even keel of forum etiquette, so to speak. I do so hope you understand this need of ours to keep precious and beautiful David's forum!

It is understood that moderation may be required to remove negativity, if that is so desired. In that aspect you and the rest of the moderation team at DC have my respect, understanding, and thanks. However, editing positive posts, changing post names, and removing posts not deemed adequate or in the spirit of what is exactly desired, on a daily basis, is not moderation. It is, simply put, controlling.

Point to ponder...

46.7 Ra: Control is the key to negatively polarized use of catalyst. Acceptance is the key to positively polarized use of catalyst.

And now... when is David's next blog coming out? I must accept waiting, but I still anticipate