Diana, how could it not make sense?
Confederation is not advanced or evolved?
Because some trees and some animals died?
I do not want to sound rude, but the alternative (3rd density death) is worse than 1st/2nd density "damage", especially when this reality is such that you can always come back again, and again, and again. I am pretty sure that the Tree social memory complex lovingly accepted that tiny sacrifice it had to make in order to not make a fuss over a fusion reactor blowing up o_o
And do not take this the wrong way: I would love if no life would be lost, but life as such - when experienced as being a part of something bigger in lower densities - are designed to end, always. That does not mean that the Confederation is dumb or selfish or not advanced.
Yes. I imagine that being on higher levels, we will make many mistakes as mistakes are designed to be a huge part in the learning process. And we are moving, we are evolving as long as there are things to learn. What happened to a lot of civilizations (like Maldek, Atlantis, etc) pointed flaws out in the design of this Logos and its veil probably, and that is why they have set up this drone in the first place (imho). Of course they would make no mistakes if they did not try to observer us more closely - for our own sake.
Confederation is not advanced or evolved?
Because some trees and some animals died?
I do not want to sound rude, but the alternative (3rd density death) is worse than 1st/2nd density "damage", especially when this reality is such that you can always come back again, and again, and again. I am pretty sure that the Tree social memory complex lovingly accepted that tiny sacrifice it had to make in order to not make a fuss over a fusion reactor blowing up o_o
And do not take this the wrong way: I would love if no life would be lost, but life as such - when experienced as being a part of something bigger in lower densities - are designed to end, always. That does not mean that the Confederation is dumb or selfish or not advanced.
(01-19-2012, 06:46 PM)DuncanIdahoTPF Wrote: I think that the fallacy of these "ETs" is one of the most comforting things I have run across reading/consuming Q'uo and other material. If they are infallible... then I couldn't possibly be "one" with them as they would be truly "alien" to me. If everyone made the exact correct / most efficient decision every single time (even for more advanced beings than us), things would get very boring very fast. And to me, "perfection" and "idealism" go hand in hand. We have all seen what idolatry has done to this world (*coughorganizedreligionscough*).
Personally, I don't think I could accomplish anything that I could describe as "perfection" in this density and even in 4 - 7th density I could imagine myself still considering that a quite lofty goal.
Yes. I imagine that being on higher levels, we will make many mistakes as mistakes are designed to be a huge part in the learning process. And we are moving, we are evolving as long as there are things to learn. What happened to a lot of civilizations (like Maldek, Atlantis, etc) pointed flaws out in the design of this Logos and its veil probably, and that is why they have set up this drone in the first place (imho). Of course they would make no mistakes if they did not try to observer us more closely - for our own sake.