Thanks for the warm-greeting. Though I'm not sure if I'm happy with this "insane sanity." I've found the only way I've, thus far, been able to effectively impart these ideas is to internalize the "math" and then break it down in to some form of parable as understood by the persons background. It's frustrating that it distorts the pure message, but any form of communication is better than none at all.
As to your second point ...
Pummeling people over the head with information they wouldn't naturally and readily accept is an exercise in futility. I do however feel it necessary to share some of these more incredible ideas about math, economics, morality, philosophy, cosmology, and theological / eschatological notions with those who are willing to listen. If the data is accepted in a peer-reviewed manner it wouldn't be me spreading the word but rather those in academia who co-opt the ideas in to the larger body of scientific-wisdom.
It's often through new knowledge / insight that people better differentiate between choosing the high or the low road. Anything that ameliorates the degree of insanity seen in the world at present can only improve things.
As to your second point ...
Pummeling people over the head with information they wouldn't naturally and readily accept is an exercise in futility. I do however feel it necessary to share some of these more incredible ideas about math, economics, morality, philosophy, cosmology, and theological / eschatological notions with those who are willing to listen. If the data is accepted in a peer-reviewed manner it wouldn't be me spreading the word but rather those in academia who co-opt the ideas in to the larger body of scientific-wisdom.
It's often through new knowledge / insight that people better differentiate between choosing the high or the low road. Anything that ameliorates the degree of insanity seen in the world at present can only improve things.