12-27-2011, 05:14 AM
(12-26-2011, 10:19 PM)zenmaster Wrote:(12-26-2011, 07:27 PM)Ankh Wrote: Thus, in my understanding, it is a misbelief that a healer may do any changes in another self, that are not "good" for this entity.
Consider the meaning of 'good'. Someone working with indigo-ray energy can cause (good) disease as well. This is in keeping with the concept of what is exploitable by a psychic greeting. It can be argued that there was an unconscious acceptance of such a new, diseased distortion. Whether or not the affected entity was 'tricked'. If something offered was merely a viable new condition (healthier or not), and it is accepted, you have the new condition. It is a fool-proof system of learning.
I lacked the proper word for what I wished to say, and this was not the right choice of word by me. We are talking about healing here:
Ra Wrote:The healing, if it is to be effectuated, must be a funneling without significant distortion of the in-streamings through the spiritual complex into the tree of mind. There are parts of this mind which block energies flowing to the body complex. In each case, in each entity, the blockage may well differ.
However, it is necessary to activate the sense of the spiritual channel or shuttle. Then whether the blockage is from spiritual to mental or from mental to physical, or whether it may simply be a random and purely physical trauma, healing may then be carried out.
So it should have said perhaps that, in my understanding, it is a misbelief that a healer may do any changes in another self, that are not accepted, consciously or unconsciously yes, by this entity. Some distortion/s block/s the free flow of intelligent energy, which if there are no blocks perfecting moment by moment the individual's body complex by instreaming down into the mind/body/spirit complex (Ra, 12:31). The healer offers an opportunity for a new set of realignment or aid in realignment of either energy centers or some connection between the energies of mind and body, spirit and mind, or spirit and body (Ra, 66:9).