10-25-2009, 10:15 PM
Steve, you do have some really good food for thought - and for second thought. Thank you for that. It's definitely true that just as with people, channeled entities could also be faked by someone else with a desire to slip in an incompatible message.
Here is what I wonder. Say I was to go to a session with channeling of a usually positive entity, with the opportunity for audience questions. Do I understand that it could it be a good idea to ask something like this:
In the Law of One material, Carla the channeler and Ra the message-bringer had some distinctive protocols to protect the integrity of the message. The channeller asked if the messenger would affirm the unconditional love of Christ consciousness, the highest spiritual good the channeller could imagine. The messenger started and ended each session with a greeting that referred to the qualities of the One Infinite Creator, such as light, love, and peace. The messenger began each response with a statement of the messenger's name. Would the current messenger be willing to use these same protocols to demonstrate clarity, accuracy, and a positive intention in this channeling?
Would this kind of question address the concerns Steve, Monica, and Carrie are bringing up?
Here is what I wonder. Say I was to go to a session with channeling of a usually positive entity, with the opportunity for audience questions. Do I understand that it could it be a good idea to ask something like this:
In the Law of One material, Carla the channeler and Ra the message-bringer had some distinctive protocols to protect the integrity of the message. The channeller asked if the messenger would affirm the unconditional love of Christ consciousness, the highest spiritual good the channeller could imagine. The messenger started and ended each session with a greeting that referred to the qualities of the One Infinite Creator, such as light, love, and peace. The messenger began each response with a statement of the messenger's name. Would the current messenger be willing to use these same protocols to demonstrate clarity, accuracy, and a positive intention in this channeling?
Would this kind of question address the concerns Steve, Monica, and Carrie are bringing up?