David Wilcock

[Monica]

By the way, if you haven't kept up with David's material because of all the negative conspiracy material, you might find the Coast segment and follow-up to be more to your taste. These days he seems to have a generally uplifting, hopeful message about positive changes occurring all around us at this time.

That's good to know! I'll check it out!

...my question is: has David ever challenged his own version of Ra with Carla's same channel? Has he asked that his own Ra contact affirm the unconditional love of Christ consciousness, or whatever else David might think of as even more important? Or has he just relied on his own feelings or analysis to show him that the contact is valid and brings the truth?

That's a good question! Please let us know what you find out, if he answers you over there.

I agree with Ali that, ultimately, I judge the info on its own merit, and not by any supposed safeguards the channeler claims to have implemented. It is entirely possible for someone to claim to have challenged the source, but not really have been sincere, and so the challenge might not have been very effective. Or, their perception of their challenge might be entirely different from ours.

For example, let's say a corrupt, greedy mega-church pastor might pray in the name of Jesus in words only, but doesn't really mean it...I wouldn't automatically assume that his opinions are necessarily resonating with Christ Consciousness just because he claimed to have prayed to Jesus. His perception of what is meant by the name 'Jesus' might be entirely different from what I perceive it to be. I actually met someone who used the name Jesus to back up his assertion that war was acceptable, citing a Bible quote attributed to Jesus about him coming to bring not peace but a sword! For this person, Jesus represented war, not peace.

Having said that, I admit I am curious as to what DW's challenging process might have been, or if he had one at all. So I really would be interested in the answer to your question! I'm just pointing out that, whether we might happen to know what their challenging process is or not, and even if the challenging process might sound really good on the surface, I think the content of the info (and whether we resonate with it) takes precedence.