Understanding Carla's challenge in the name of Christ

[Bring4th_Steve]

[Bashar's] communication style is so remarkably distinctive that it would be almost silly to have it announce the name with every sentence.

Questioner, we are now talking apples and oranges. Bashar is trance channeled, while Q'uo is not. Therefore it makes a lot of sense for Q'uo to need to qualify itself during each transmission to ensure the integrity of the message. I also believe Q'uo follows this protocol as an extension to Ra's original protocol, since Ra is still providing all information to Latwii and Hatton (Ra, Hatton and Latwii make up Q'uo), which is then stepped down to Carla's vibration.

Frankly, I wish all channels followed a protocol of identifying themselves during each answer or message, even if they "sounded" distinctive enough from session to session (like Bashar). There are so many ways entities can don sheeps wool and "act" like the Bashars or Joshiahs out there, offering messages of love with hidden little fear-based messages along the way that would help create an eventual avalanche of detuning. Carla has lamented on more than one occasion how this has happened to so many channels over the years.

The content, tone of voice, accent inflections, attitude, body language, etc. make clear the same entity is present. This is even before the content matches up from one message to another. It is already clear and obvious which messages come from the entity, without the "I am.." repetition. So this seems to make clear who is speaking, even though the name isn't announced throughout every session.

Questioner, I would think twice on this. As I mentioned, other entities can easy "interject" themselves and mimic a source. That is how so many other channelers got fooled into passing along increasingly negative information until it became blatantly obvious that something bad happened. Even to this day, if you confront a channelers' message as negative, you'll often get a sharp response back from that person that "you" are the one being negative! It's almost like denial because as far as the channeler is concerned, the entity is still the same as it/they were on Day 1 of establishing contact. That is why the challenge process is so critical, yet so few do it.

The way I see it, is that Carla's challenge would be wise for any channeler to use. But it would not help much to demand that other entities use exactly the same communication protocol as Ra did.

In my opinion, I feel the opposite. If I am channeling any source whatsoever, I "need" to know that the message is from the source that I believe it to be. Especially if I am going to be sharing my messages with the rest of the world! Requesting this "protocol" from the source is completely necessary, in my view. In fact I can't imagine why, if the entity is truly interested in communicating, that they wouldn't follow this practice of establishing integrity. Would you want your own messages to someone getting intercepted and transmuted into another meaning that becomes more and more fear-based over time? To me, I would appreciate and value channelers who think enough to employ such a thorough level of checks and balances. As we've heard many times, it's a crowded universe out there!

Steve