Caring/Compassion/Sensitivity/Tact vs Lying/Faking

[Monica]

there is no error in anything.

You don't know that for sure.

the quote states that because blue is missing from the negative system of power, green and blue VIBRATORY ENERGIES are not seen in the VIBRATORY SCHEDULES Or patterns of negative fourth and fifth rates of vibration.

You have made sense of it in your mind, therefore you believe it to be correct. But you might be wrong.

it seems you have not understood the quote there at all.

Maybe. Or maybe you have misunderstood it. Either is possible.

nothing makes sense if you dont understand the quote in detail.

Or it might make sense, but be wrong.

A person who doesn't understand the quote in detail, might actually be correct in the overall concept.

We are debating this or that quote. Very much like when the Christians debate Bible quotes.

But maybe we are missing the point. Maybe the point is to understand the concepts, rather than the details.

My understanding of the STO path is that it's loving, caring, kind and compassionate.

The STS path is inconsiderate, insensitive, uncompassionate, and even cruel.

You seem to be arguing in favor of the STS path.

If you think an STO entity can extinguish the joy in a child without concern, then it is you who has misunderstood the paths....regardless of how you interpret and analyze Ra's words.

apparently you are still moving from your misperception of the initial quote.

Likewise, you may be doing that very thing you say I am doing.

Neither can be proven.

I am simply asking you to consider that you may be wrong.

you should go back and dwell on the quote.

Indeed I will! Likewise, you should consider the possibility that you have created an elaborate analysis based on an error.

green vibratory energy is missing from negative spectrum, because the negative system does not have blue energy.

It doesn't make sense to me that green would be lacking because a higher ray is lacking. The higher rays build on the lower. Green is the foundation for the higher rays.

You are using circular logic. You are trying to prove that the quote is correct, because the quote says xyz. But if the quote is incorrect, then your entire premise is wrong.

Consider this:

87.11 Questioner: I’m sorry for getting confused on my question here in not asking it correctly. There is a philosophical point of central importance that I am trying to clear up here. It has to do with the fact that fourth-density negative seems to be aware of the first distortion. They are in a nonveiled condition, and they seem to use this knowledge of the first distortion to maintain the situation that they maintain in contacts with this planet. I am trying to extract their ability to understand the mechanism of the first distortion and the consequences of the veiling process and still remain in a mental configuration of separation on the negative path. I hope that I have made myself clear there. I have had a hard time asking this question.
Ra: I am Ra. The answer may still not satisfy the questioner. We ask that you pursue it until you are satisfied. The fourth-density negative entity has made the choice available to each at third-density harvest. It is aware of the full array of possible methods of viewing the universe of the One Creator and it is convinced that the ignoring and non-use of the green-ray energy center will be the method most efficient in providing harvestability of fourth density. Its operations among those of third density which have not yet made this choice are designed to offer to each the opportunity to consider the self-serving polarity and its possible attractiveness.

This seems to indicate why green is lacking. Not because of lack of blue.

has the date about orion entry been corrected because don questioned ? no.

Providing an example of when Ra corrected a mistake does not negate the possibility that another mistake went undetected.

Had Ra known that they would correct every error, why did they say "Please continue to scan for errors" ?

excuse me, but you are wrong again. deactivation of green ray does not mean you went negative. it means, you have fallen back into YELLOW. that may be positive, or negative yellow, depending on what your situation with yellow was, before you activated green.

In some cases, yes. That would depend on the density of the entity and whether the higher chakras had been activated.

i dont even know how you are able to confuse the two. missing green ray does not make an entity negative, neither does being possessive of another entity due to yellow/orange ray immaturity does not make another entity negative. the latter is just one of the lessons of 3rd density.

being negative requires a conscious effort to exploit others for yourself.

An entity with an active green ray could not exploit others.

---

Whether 4D STS or 5D STS, do you agree that such an action is cruel, lacks compassion, and therefore is an STS act?

no.

Wow. You continue to astonish me.

Thank you for making crystal clear that you don't value the things most of us hold dear and consider to be hallmarks of the STO path: kindness, compassion, and caring for others.