Quite interesting - Mayan day/nights and earth periods

[Bring4th_Austin]

There is no difference between "instant" and "gradual" if "instant" is indefinitely projected into the future. It's perpetual incipience of the "event" unfolding according to hyper-intuitive notions of transcendence or pareidolia of current events matching expectations of awakening-to-higher-vibrational behavior. Framing, which by now, over 30 years, is becoming trite and shallow.

The "way out" of being held down to a date or even a date range has been, and will continue to be, re-interpretation of the material and hand-waving of subjective feelings and subjective correlations of external events as important signs of imminence (of course always more important than the 'event' itself, due to the ego-bound, unconscious complexes involved).

Perhaps the terms "instant" and "gradual" do not fully express the opposing schools of thought I was trying to define. "Instant" being described as a noticeable event which will impact our lifetimes in a very real way.

In addition to not being able to define "instant", connotations for "noticeable" and "very real" are also relegated to purely subjective and selective (ephemeral) notions.

I quite understand what you're saying. But I always imagined the "instant" harvest picture painted by Unity (and others) to be an inescapable event in which none would question the actual existence and passing of such event.

Let's say that one day the sky instantly turned red. Few would exist who would legitimately try to refute this fact. It would be known by all who had seen the blue sky and now see a red sky. But let's say that the sky turned red gradually over a period of 1000 years. The change would not be noticeable day-to-day, but still apparent over a period of time.

"Gradual" being described as a seamless change, perhaps only barely noticeable or not at all, to the degree where when the event is complete, there is no difference from one day to the next, yet a noticeable difference in a larger amount of time.

I don't understand either of these "options". If, when one dies during harvest, they qualify for the next vibration, they get a new core vibration. If the transition to the higher vibration is hundreds of years, then they (now, what Ra calls part of the "new breed") probably have only partial use of the abilities afforded to that higher vibration.

I think from that perspective, the main difference would be whether we are forced into "death" from some outside mechanic of harvest, or whether we harvested upon natural death.