10-20-2009, 08:26 PM
(10-20-2009, 07:57 PM)3D Sunset Wrote: As you've seen, the work is undeniably considered to be historical in nature.
If you're referring to the wikipedia quote that Peregrine posted, I think that, too is ambiguous. It could mean nothing more than that it's a realistic novel rather than a fantastical one.
(10-20-2009, 07:57 PM)3D Sunset Wrote: Ultimately, I see it as less concerning than the 1,500 year discrepancy in the age of the great pyramid at Giza, and I didn't have any problem shrugging that one off.
I think I vaguely remember seeing a thread where this was discussed, but I couldn't find it quickly by using the forum search function. Could you refer me to the discussion or summarize it for me?