10-31-2011, 06:38 PM
(10-31-2011, 05:54 PM)Namaste Wrote:(10-31-2011, 03:44 PM)unity100 Wrote: yes and that consideration must not take the form of faking. telling someone that s/he is wrong in a veiled fashion, while what you say appears as if you are not saying it.
at the minimum it is more disrespect for the other person, because it is manipulating. you are basically telling that s/he is wrong, but, it doesnt appear as if you are doing that.
Jesus spoke in parables - through a veil - as to not force his own wisdom onto people.
did he fake his intent in parables ?
Quote:Quote:73.13 Questioner: What was the orientation with respect to this type of communication for the one known as Jesus of Nazareth?
Ra: I am Ra. You may have read some of this entity’s workings. It offered itself as teacher to those mind/body/spirit complexes which gathered to hear and even then spoke as through a veil so as to leave room for those not wishing to hear.
I suppose Jesus was wrong also? :¬)
where is the immunity of jesus of nazareth in regard to being right/wrong comes from ?
he can indeed be wrong.
however, he was not wrong in that case. telling something in a veiled fashion, and faking what you are actually meaning, are two different things.
Quote:When one, acting from compassion, talks to another with regards to offering an alternative notion, they will naturally offer it in a way as to not offend them. That is the nature of compassion/kindness. It's not something one thinks about (fakes), it's inherent in their nature.
Fakery is an issue only for those not acting genuinely out of compassion. It's as simple as that.
acting out of compassion does not change what is untruth to truth. it does not alleviate any grand karmic implications of lying or faking either. one pertains to 4th ray, one pertains to 5th. neither can override or undo the other.
making some talk appear as if you are agreeing/not disagreeing with someone and then telling them in a veiled fashion that they are wrong, is fake. its as simple as that. justifying that fakery with political correctness, or compassion, wont change the fact that fake is fake.
.........
that is why you dont find fake in the material you are supposedly studying. the source you are reading, directly tells the questioner that he is incorrect, bluntly answers 'no' to various questions, and even at times directly says that a question or a formulated proposition is unintelligible.
why arent you accusing or criticizing them for their lack of compassion and bluntness ?