10-18-2011, 01:07 PM
David, thanks for the interesting contributions. But why do you keep calling Ra a "He"?
Everyone who has read the Law of One knows that Ra is a social memory complex consisting of many, many, many souls.
The Ra that we refer to on this entire web site is not a "He" or a "She", nor a God or a Father to idolize. Granted, it is possible there are entities who call themselves "Ra" to mislead others, but those are not the entities we are talking about on this web site. Unfortunately, if you try to convince us of that then many people are going to become very confused by your writings.
This site is based on the Law of One book series. You need to read the series to understand what a majority of this community resonates with. If we can't agree on the basics, could you really expect us to resonate with a completely new set of personal beliefs?
To make a simple analogy; most of us are gathered here talking about oranges, and then a new individual comes up and begins to share information about apples. Yes, they are both called "fruit", but they are two completely different aspects of the citrus family. And for this new individual to declare that an apple is exactly the same thing as an orange would be very foolish.
Also, it is unclear what your intentions are. Are you trying to explain that all of us are wrong in our beliefs and that your version of history is the one we need to accept and follow? Please let us know why you are sharing your information with us. What is your goal by sharing such information?
I am sure there are some beneficial aspects to your contributions, but as I stated before you still have not provided any points of reference or solid material that we can try to understand. At this point, we might as well agree that we are gathered around a campfire and listening to interesting fantasy.
Please help us out! Again, I must remind that we are not here to challenge each other, as it is perfectly acceptable in the eyes of Creation to have a truly unique belief set. For anyone to say that you are wrong would be a judgment placed upon you, which is a Service to Self action and not love-based. However, my concern is that these beliefs are not compatible with the intentions of this forum, which is designed around the Law of One material, not an "Uncle Ra".
If we can't come to an agreement, I think I may need to move this thread into "Non-L/L Research Channeled Sources". That way we can be sure there is no confusion between the book series and your version of Ra, which may have its own truths.
Thanks,
Steve
Everyone who has read the Law of One knows that Ra is a social memory complex consisting of many, many, many souls.
The Ra that we refer to on this entire web site is not a "He" or a "She", nor a God or a Father to idolize. Granted, it is possible there are entities who call themselves "Ra" to mislead others, but those are not the entities we are talking about on this web site. Unfortunately, if you try to convince us of that then many people are going to become very confused by your writings.
This site is based on the Law of One book series. You need to read the series to understand what a majority of this community resonates with. If we can't agree on the basics, could you really expect us to resonate with a completely new set of personal beliefs?
To make a simple analogy; most of us are gathered here talking about oranges, and then a new individual comes up and begins to share information about apples. Yes, they are both called "fruit", but they are two completely different aspects of the citrus family. And for this new individual to declare that an apple is exactly the same thing as an orange would be very foolish.
Also, it is unclear what your intentions are. Are you trying to explain that all of us are wrong in our beliefs and that your version of history is the one we need to accept and follow? Please let us know why you are sharing your information with us. What is your goal by sharing such information?
I am sure there are some beneficial aspects to your contributions, but as I stated before you still have not provided any points of reference or solid material that we can try to understand. At this point, we might as well agree that we are gathered around a campfire and listening to interesting fantasy.
Please help us out! Again, I must remind that we are not here to challenge each other, as it is perfectly acceptable in the eyes of Creation to have a truly unique belief set. For anyone to say that you are wrong would be a judgment placed upon you, which is a Service to Self action and not love-based. However, my concern is that these beliefs are not compatible with the intentions of this forum, which is designed around the Law of One material, not an "Uncle Ra".
If we can't come to an agreement, I think I may need to move this thread into "Non-L/L Research Channeled Sources". That way we can be sure there is no confusion between the book series and your version of Ra, which may have its own truths.
Thanks,
Steve