Ra's calling, Law of One Book 1, Law of Squares

[paddy]

They can't be independent, precisely because they are one in the same function. They may only seem to act independent, due to an imposed reference which excludes (out of convenience).

I think of the word calling in this context as related to summoning, and I think of the word bidding in this context as related to performing a service. If bidding and calling then are one may be considered one and the same function, then it seems as if the two parties involved are conjoined into one in such a way that the two actions might be considered one in the same, just as breathing may be a combination of exhaling and inhaling.

Another way of considering one and the sameness is with the concept of that in a simultaneous moment there may be some sort of reciprocal trade that happens, which differs only in perception of the two parties involved. This may be not so unlike listening to music with someone else but coming away from the experience of listening with a very different opinion. This could be interpreted as a filtering effect that promotes an illusory vision streamlined down from the whole story.

I think many people more easily relate to time delay cause and effect experiences, like an echo effect. The call happens first and then the bidding occurs as an effect. Here the act of calling may distract a person from using their sensory acuity in a way that allows them to better perceive the bidding. So they call first and then remain quiet in waiting for the bidding, as a person may do who listens for an echo.


paddy