09-15-2011, 06:21 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-15-2011, 06:31 PM by Tenet Nosce.)
(06-17-2011, 09:41 AM)βαθμιαίος Wrote: Well, the page did end up getting deleted, but I have a hunch that its author is now an active member here. For those who might be interested, the former wikipedia page is available at lawofone.info: http://www.lawofone.info/pdfs/ra-channeled-entity.pdfROFL! You posted this three days before I came back to Bring4th. BTW, I was not the author of that page. I gave up on wikipedia some time ago.
(09-15-2011, 05:26 AM)yossarian Wrote: I have a feeling Logos5557 is unity100.
:exclamation:
(09-15-2011, 05:39 PM)yossarian Wrote:The basic premise of wikipedia is if that you are acting in "good faith" you are free to change whatever you like. However, everybody else is also free to change whatever you have done. There are many ways to go about this, from writing a huge exposition, and having it whittled away by others. Or slowly building piece by piece. Or anything in between.(09-15-2011, 05:29 PM)βαθμιαίος Wrote:Go ahead and change it how you think it should be. As long as you are improving the accuracy of wikipedia without making it into your personal preaching ground the admins will appreciate it I think.(09-15-2011, 05:22 PM)yossarian Wrote: I don't see why it redirects there
I think it was part of the politics of deleting logos5557's page, but I'm not sure.
I think we all know that Don Elkins redirecting to Ancient Astronauts is an oversimplification. If someone wants to write a biography of Don Elkins that would improve the accuracy of wikipedia.
Keep in mind that you will likely be spending much time on this... better, in my humble opinion, to keep it short, with links as it currently has, so that L/L can speak for themselves, rather than having others speak for them.
In my experience, wikipedia-ing was a huge time-sink with little return of investment. Perhaps you will have a totally different experience, but just wanted to share.