09-12-2011, 01:46 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-12-2011, 01:55 AM by Tenet Nosce.)
(09-11-2011, 03:50 AM)zenmaster Wrote: All 197 pages.
I doubt I will find the time to commit to such a task. Although should you recall anything specific that you found to be highly valuable, please do share.
Also I am trying to wrap my mind around the paradox of spending 197 pages on negative entities before understanding fully how to avoid being influenced by them. It seems like the purposeful dwelling of the mind on such matters increases the likelihood of such encounters to occur.
zenmaster Wrote:That's all explained in the first page and 1/2.
I didn't make it through to the middle of the second page. Likely the answer is immediately following the point where I decided to stop reading.
(09-12-2011, 12:40 AM)Icaro Wrote: From how the material presents this topic, a lot of the time emotions such as discouragement, doubt, depression, insecurity etc. are suggested or amplified by negative entities. These are all separative thoughts, emotions which attempt to devalue your individuality and deny acceptance from who and what you really are, or place a wedge between you and others leading to all sorts of deviation from a wanderers mission. So you could say they manifest from the negative 'realm' of separation regardless, but in the end these are all extremely useful catalyst if you're able to process them effectively.
Do you know what is curious to me? How is it that a bunch of wanderers could get so caught up in driving wedges between one another? Why is it that we cannot even seem to communicate with one another on a web forum without chaos ensuing? Where is this chaos coming from? Who is responsible for it? And how can it be used for the positive?
Or, more generally speaking.. what exactly is going on when one entity- feeling/thinking they are speaking respectfully towards another entity- is perceived by the other entity as an "attack". What responsibility does the first entity take unto itself for being the source of the perceived "attack"? Perhaps more importantly, what can an entity do to ensure that its words and intentions are not twisted to the negative against their will?