The Detuning of Session 17 and Ra's True Intentions Regarding 2011 - Part II

[Tenet Nosce]

Session 80 - Ra starts the session by saying they made an error in stating which archetype was the Significator of the Mind. In the previous session, Carla was having pain flares and apparently this was the cause of the mistake. Ra actually had to pause during session 79 during this pain flare, which is when the error occurred. A negative entity perhaps used this to their advantage to confuse the information.

I am just now looking deeper into this one. Again, very interesting. So Carla was under psychic attack causing a pain flare which caused a misstatement of "Mind" as "Body". This is a blatant example of how the changing of a single word can cause so much confusion. And this word substitution is being very unambiguously connected to a psychic attack.

From Session 80 (27 Feb 82):

This instrument is prey to sudden flares towards the distortion known as pain. We are aware of your conscientious attempts to aid the instrument but know of no other modality available to the support group other than the provision of water therapy upon the erect spinal portion of the physical body complex, which we have previously mentioned.

This instrument’s distortions of body do not ever rule out, shall we say, such flares during these periods of increased distortion of the body complex. Our contact may become momentarily garbled. Therefore, we request that any information which seems garbled be questioned as we wish this contact to remain as undistorted as the limitations of language, mentality, and sensibility allow.

This is also interesting from Session 80, with respect to Ra's ability to properly respond to a query:

Ra: I am Ra. It is a challenge to answer such a query, for there is some confusion in its construction. However, we shall attempt to speak upon the subject.

Also some other interesting things from the previous Session 79 (24 Feb 82)

Questioner: Could you de-roughen it or elucidate a bit on that?

Ra: I am Ra. There is intervening material before we may do so.

Questioner: OK. At the present time we are experiencing the effects of a more complex or greater number of archetypes and I have guessed that the ones we are experiencing now in the mind are as follows: We have the Magician and High Priestess which correspond to the Matrix and Potentiator with the veil drawn between them which is the primary creator of the extension of the first distortion. Is that correct?

Ra: I am Ra. We are unable to answer this query without intervening material.

It would appear that, at least by this point in the contact, Ra had some foreknowledge of what was going to be queried in the future.

Also in Session 79, there was another flare causing a 90 second pause. This seems pretty severe!

Questioner: The archetypical mind of the Logos prior to this experiment in veiling was what I would consider to be less complex than it is now, possibly containing fewer archetypes. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. We must ask your patience. We perceive a sudden flare of the distortion known as pain in this instrument’s left arm and manual appendages. Please do not touch this instrument. We shall examine the mind complex and attempt to reposition the limb so that the working may continue. Then please repeat the query.

(90 second pause)

I am Ra. You may proceed.

Session 79 also has a couple clues about the effectiveness of the banishing ritual and walking the circle:

Questioner: We have been ending our banishing ritual prior to the session by a gesture that relieves us of the magical personality. I was just wondering if we should maintain this personality and omit that gesture while we are walking the Circle of One and then relinquish the magical personality only after the circle is formed or after the session? Which would be more appropriate?

Ra: I am Ra. The practice of magical workings demands the most rigorous honesty. If your estimate of your ability is that you can sustain the magical personality throughout this working, it is well. As long as you have some doubt it is inadvisable. In any case it is appropriate for this instrument to return its magical personality rather than carry this persona into the trance state, for it does not have the requisite magical skill to function in this circumstance and would be far more vulnerable than if the waking personality is offered as channel. This working is indeed magical in nature in the basic sense. However, it is inappropriate to move more quickly than one’s feet may walk.

I wonder what was that gesture, and from where did it originate?

The next question addresses somewhat the issues of distraction and leaving the circle:

Questioner: I had to leave the room for a forgotten item after we performed the banishing ritual. Did this have a deleterious effect on the ritual or the working?

Ra: I am Ra. Were it the only working the lapse would have been critical. There is enough residual energy of a protective nature in this place of working that this lapse, though quite unrecommended, does not represent a threat to the protection which the ritual of which you spoke offers.

Ra is saying the residual effects made up for the lapse, but that it would have been critical had it been the only working. So what does this say about Session One?!

Going back to the previous Session 78 (19 Feb 82) is when the misstep occurred:

Questioner: Was there some problem with the ritual we performed that made it necessary to perform the ritual twice?

Ra: I am Ra. There was a misstep which created a momentary lapse of concentration. This was not well.

Questioner: What was the misstep?

Ra: I am Ra. It was a missed footing.

Interesting. Ra says the misstep created the lapse in concentration, not the other way around.

Then... they are talking about the kidneys again!

Questioner: The instrument would like for me to ask if there is any problem with her kidneys?

Ra: I am Ra. This query is more complex than its brevity certifies. The physical complex renal system of this instrument is much damaged. The time/space equivalent which rules the body complex is without flaw. There was a serious question, due to psychic attack, as to whether the spiritual healing of this system would endure. It did so but has the need to be re-enforced by affirmation of the ascendancy of the spiritual over the apparent or visible.

Again, linking the kidneys to a psychic attack.

The session closes with yet another attack on Carla resulting in the misstatement of Archetype Four:

The alignments are fastidious. We appreciate your conscientiousness. In order to enhance the comfort of the instrument it might be suggested that careful manipulation of the dorsal area be accomplished before a working.

It is also suggested that, due to the attempt at psychic attack, this instrument will require warmth along the right side of the physical complex. There has been some infringement but it should not be long-lasting. It is, however, well to swaddle this instrument sufficiently to ward off any manifestation of this cold in physical form.

The attack occurs, despite the alignments being fastidious. This also causes me to question... if Ra can just so easily come back and make a correction... what would be the point of an entity attempting to garble the words?

---

If I am correct, there was no Book V material in Sessions 78 - 80.

How about differences in the relistened versions?

Session 78

These tools were of three kinds.

These tools were of two kinds.

:exclamation: Wild! This is also where I have a brain fart in the material. In fact, I had just read past this part not less than an hour ago, and had brain fart again trying to figure out what Ra is saying here!

Then we have some interesting changes where Ra said Don was "quite correct" but it got cut out of the original, and the queries got garbled. Here is the relistened version:

Questioner: Then we have, at the beginning of this galactic evolution, an archetypical mind that is the product of the previous octave which this galaxy then uses and acts upon under the first distortion of free will to evolve the total experience of this galaxy. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is quite correct.

Then, another brain fart moment. I JUST read this and my mind when... whaa? and then just sort of skimmed over this quote. I can't make this stuff up!

You may see the air and fire of that which is chaos...

You may see the air and water of that which is chaos...

I know this might sound nitpicky.. but having already been somewhat familiar with the four elements and how they combine, this is the sort of thing that caused be to "tune out" as I was going through Book 4 the first time. I am still struggling now, in this moment with it.

On to Session 79.

Next... a major difference in the question about the gesture in the banishing ritual that I referred to earlier:

Questioner: We have been ending our banishing ritual prior to the session by a gesture that relieves us of the magical personality. I was just wondering if we should maintain this personality and omit that gesture while we are walking the Circle of One and then relinquish the magical personality only after the circle is formed or after the session? Which would be more appropriate?

Questioner: We have been ending our banishing ritual prior to the session here by a gesture that relieves us of the magical personality. I was just wondering if we should maintain this— omit that gesture so as to maintain the magical personality while performing the Circle of One and then only relinquish the magical personality either after that is formed or after the session? Which would be more appropriate?

Next... another correction... right before Ra is noting a flare! Somehow, "veiling" got substituted for "first distortion":

Questioner: The archetypical mind of the Logos prior to this experiment in veiling was what I would consider to be less complex than it is now, possibly containing fewer archetypes. Is this correct?

Questioner: The archetypical mind of the Logos prior to this experiment in extension of the first distorion then was what I would consider to be less complex than it is now, possibly containing fewer archetypes. Is this correct?

Yet ANOTHER brain fart moment:

Could you expand even more upon the Matrix of the Mind, the Potentiator of the Mind, and the Significator of the Mind, how they differ, and what their relationships are, please?

Could you expand even more upon the Matrix of the Mind, the Potentiator, and the Significator, how they differ, and what their relationships are, please?

NOW it makes sense why Ra started talking about the Matrix of the Body and the Matrix of the Spirit. Because Don did not actually specify "of the Mind" for all three as in the original version. This is yet again where my mind got stuck here and discombobulated.

I notice that this "of the Mind" error continues on in the session. I think perhaps somebody was trying to add that for clarity... but it actually resulted in confusion in my case.

As for Session 80:

Don is directly asking about the persistent attack, wondering why it is so important for the 5D entity to interfere. Interestingly, here is a comment that was completely redacted from the original:

Since it seems to me that those who will understand this information will quite possibly already be within the limits of harvestability.

Considering all the confusion around "harvestability", this seems significant.

---

Going back to the previous Session 78 (19 Feb 82) is when the misstep occurred:

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqarchives/significant/sig_1982.php

This listing has two 6+ earthquakes on 20 Feb 82. I wonder if there was previously any solar activity.

EDIT: Well that didn't take long. Here we have an observation of an unusual spiral flare on 19 Feb 82.

http://www.astrosurf.com/luxorion/research4.htm

But what happened in 1982 suggests that amateurs can still produce scientific results. For the first time in the history of telescope, we observed a spiral sunspots group that nobody could explain as you can see at left.

First time in the history of the telescope inexplicable sunspots were observed. That sounds rather significant.

I also found something about an anomalous series of twelve quakes in three hours in Berne in 1982, but haven't yet tracked down the exact date.

Here is another interesting nugget. They are talking about the connection between solar activity and what could be perceived as "earth changes":

The aa index of geomagnetic disturbance, presumably disturbance by the solar wind, remained surprisingly low during the sunspot maximum of 1979. ... Suddenly, in February 1982, the aa index jumped to double its level of the preceding months and rose sharply to the highest level in its 118 years of record, remaining quite high during 1983. The whole pattern of weather action changed.

And here is something else! Somebody "just so happened" to keep a daily survey of solar activity from 01 Feb 81 to 28 Feb 82. Haven't yet delved into the details, but wanted to share.