there is nothing 'self-feeding' about plain direct english sentences.
what 'mistake' ? i havent even expressed any kind of conclusion or information regarding this subject in the forum up to that point. more information that in possessed was presented, and i have changed my perspective accordingly, as any rational person should have done. instead of doggedly insisting on my perspective by going to the lengths of hypocritically trying to invalidate entirety of the material.
haaaa -> thats your problem. why dont you just come up directly and spill the problem before going to make grand accusations ?
however none of those have any relevance to the subject, since the entire discussion i have participated and the arguments i have given revolves around whether one should proceed to invalidate entirety of Ra material unwittingly in order to skip by one uncomfortable plain english sentence or not. i defended the latter. as any rational person should do.
first, it is not my world view. it is 3 separate, plain english answers to plain english questions, that dont go with the biases of one particular person. i said one particular person, because there is up to this point only one person i have claimed to be seeming to have a bias that s/he cant let go in THIS subject.
and, there IS a bias when someone goes to the below lengths in order to circumnavigate one or two english sentences.
this went on for FOUR separate threads which are each longer than at least 5 pages on average. some are even longer.
yes, the above, can only be a bias, fixation, or a fear, or a belief, or ANY kind of thing that does not let one's mind go. period. there is no other explanation, because the person does not exhibit the same behavior in any other kind of seemingly uncomfortable information.
if someone behaves totally contrary to the logic and rationale and behavior s/he presents in any kind of subject s/he participates, but, goes to the extreme lengths to circumnavigate just one little piece of information in the above fashion. yes, its something related to bias or fixation fear, whatever you call it.
'world view' -> what world view. there are around 3 plain english sentences with direct answers to direct questions.
really.
why dont you go first read the four threads you are attempting to talk about and see who is actually defending what, and then come make grand assumptions and accusations ?
Quote:So you change your mind and admit you make mistakes?
what 'mistake' ? i havent even expressed any kind of conclusion or information regarding this subject in the forum up to that point. more information that in possessed was presented, and i have changed my perspective accordingly, as any rational person should have done. instead of doggedly insisting on my perspective by going to the lengths of hypocritically trying to invalidate entirety of the material.
Quote:Changing your mind does mean you are still struggling with the concept in the context of your own, custom drama which is deep into some obsession (every 20 mins??) to correlate some guy's timing system with the world danger map, solar flares, magnetosphere, etc. (really what are you going to do next month on the 29th?)
haaaa -> thats your problem. why dont you just come up directly and spill the problem before going to make grand accusations ?
however none of those have any relevance to the subject, since the entire discussion i have participated and the arguments i have given revolves around whether one should proceed to invalidate entirety of Ra material unwittingly in order to skip by one uncomfortable plain english sentence or not. i defended the latter. as any rational person should do.
Quote:Specifically, I was referring to your projections regarding those who disagree with your worldview and how they are suspiciously depicted as being in denial due to somehow having their plans upset (by your contrived sudden 3D-ending scenario). Such a depiction is incongruous on a forum of 'wanderers' or somewhat dedicated 'seekers', who would be past that base level of ego integration.
first, it is not my world view. it is 3 separate, plain english answers to plain english questions, that dont go with the biases of one particular person. i said one particular person, because there is up to this point only one person i have claimed to be seeming to have a bias that s/he cant let go in THIS subject.
and, there IS a bias when someone goes to the below lengths in order to circumnavigate one or two english sentences.
Quote:if a person comes starts with reinterpreting, and moves on to attempt totally denying existence of, and then goes to calling to authority, than to totally abstracting and metaphorizing everything to the extent of making any kind of information totally ambiguous to oblivion and then moves on to trying to invalidate a piece of undesirable information, not realizing that the proposition that s/he proposes would invalidate ANYthing unwittingly, AND then, even after facing that eventuality, still does not let go of either the material which s/he mistakenly proposed invalidation of in all that haste, nor the attempt to find ways to invalidate a single quote or 1-2 quotes, and tries to introduce 'sufficient' level of invalidation just to invalidate the undesired elements without ANY kind of usable, generally applicable measure and footing ( long isnt it. but it doesnt stop here ) and when that also fails then proceeds to ignoring basic meanings of base, plain grammatical english sentences and makes them refer to something they dont refer and then ....
this went on for FOUR separate threads which are each longer than at least 5 pages on average. some are even longer.
yes, the above, can only be a bias, fixation, or a fear, or a belief, or ANY kind of thing that does not let one's mind go. period. there is no other explanation, because the person does not exhibit the same behavior in any other kind of seemingly uncomfortable information.
if someone behaves totally contrary to the logic and rationale and behavior s/he presents in any kind of subject s/he participates, but, goes to the extreme lengths to circumnavigate just one little piece of information in the above fashion. yes, its something related to bias or fixation fear, whatever you call it.
'world view' -> what world view. there are around 3 plain english sentences with direct answers to direct questions.
really.
why dont you go first read the four threads you are attempting to talk about and see who is actually defending what, and then come make grand assumptions and accusations ?