09-09-2011, 01:19 PM
(09-09-2011, 12:29 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: The negative result is confusion. And is the "foundation rock" of the evidence for why anybody would "dare" to suggest that the material is not 100% pristine, and free from error.
It seems that all but a few who are continuously involved in discussing the harvest have concluded that it is indeed now. So the question is do we continue biting the hook of confusion, only to be reeled into answering the same questions over and over that go no where in an attempt to prove something to someone whose opinion won't change?
Or do we move forward and accept our own conclusions, and start having more meaningful conversation? Honestly, there is no point in proving that the harvest will happen on a specific date. Why? Because if that's true, nothing can be done. But it seems the majority don't believe that to be true, so we should stop bracing ourselves and live in the present.
Quote:I am pointing out that the statement can, in fact, be correctly evaluated to mean something it does not. Why is this possible? Because Ra did not give a clear answer.
Why did Ra do this? I can think of a few possible explanations. And would be interested in investigating them. Perhaps this will be useful to me when I make contact with intelligent infinity, whether 2 months from now, or 2 billion years from now.
I maintain that it has to do with free will and the balance required between positive and negative interaction. When Don asks specific questions, he has fallen prey to the negative manipulation that has been placed on him. Ra must honor this desire and a point is scored on the negative side if you will, with a lack of clarity.