09-09-2011, 02:22 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-09-2011, 02:41 AM by Tenet Nosce.)
(09-09-2011, 01:00 AM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: Now here we are in Session 77 (10 Feb 1982), and Ra confirms that Carla was just previously under attack.
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=BQw...1982&hl=en
This article says:
Quote:U.S. scientists routinely surveying the sun have sighted a giant, pinwheel-shaped sunspot, the first time a phemonenon has been seen in visible light, the U.S. National Science Foundation announced.
The foundation said astronomers at its Kitt Peak National Observatory in Arizona first saw the unprecedented sunspot of Feb. 19 and that it held its unusual shape for several days.
"I have been observing for over 30 years and I've never seen anything like this before,' said Dr. William Livingston, a Kitt Peak astronomer. "It was a real curiosity, a rare thing."
This is not as precise of a date match, but it does place anomalous solar activity in the vicinity of Session 77. I am not fully aware of the exact state of technology at that time, but perhaps it was going on unnoticed for a few days prior to the discovery.
... and this "casually" turned up on the search:
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=t24...1982&hl=en
Somewhat tangential but very interesting about a March 1982 unusual planetary alignment, that was predicted to cause the "Big One" in California. I seem to have some vague memory of this actually.. I would have been kindergarten. Surely, this had been in L/Ls minds. Indeed, in Session One, we have "tell us about the earth changes". Apparently this prediction traces back to a 1973 book entitled The Jupiter Effect, written by two scientists.
So the story goes... one of the authors had made an attempt at a redaction, yet it was too late. It had already gripped the group mind. Of course, the prediction never came true. The scientists had a heyday with this, and we are still reeling from the fallout of the backlash against the idea that movements of celestial bodies could induce catastrophic effects upon the earth's surface, thirty years later.
The above statement is both literally and metaphorically true.
What we have here is yet another example of the recurring theme of sensitive information being put out, later redacted, and then having the redaction used by a third party as a tool for manipulation through confusion.
Hello? Archetype folk? Am I the only one noticing a theme here? Is this not the fundamental theme expressed by Ra themselves about the nature of their contact with earth humans?
(09-09-2011, 01:35 AM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote:(09-09-2011, 01:00 AM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: What? What does Ra mean that a portion of the query has been omitted?
I don't get what you're getting at here. Are you suggesting that Ra knew what had been omitted...or...what?
I am suggesting that:
A. This specific query/response initiates a distinct "brain fart" effect in my mind every time it passes over this part of the material. Which is curious because not only is this kind of interference that Icaro was proposing, but according to unity100's assessment, I myself was unwittingly making false conclusions based on information I had failed to assimilate from Book 4, due to said brain fart interference.
B. I still don't know what the hell this response from Ra means, and am hoping somebody else does know.