The Detuning of Session 17 and Ra's True Intentions Regarding 2011 - Part II

[native]

2. Ra DID give the reply, but Carla was under attack at the moment, thus the reply was not clear. Also explains why Ra did not make the correction at that time- if Carla was under attack then any attempt to correct the mistake would probably lead to even GREATER confusion.

Yes..much like a pain flare can cause Ra to say Significator of the Body when they meant Mind.

3. Ra purposely DID NOT make a correction because they understood that a certain degree of ambiguity must be allowed to pass in order to maintain balance and for free will considerations.

I agree. I'm willing to acknowledge that there could be other explanations, but I maintain my position on harvest because of the philosophy that was given to us. Ra's reference to all the other sessions which include dates, talk about how Orion polluted their message. Ra could be figuratively saying at the beginning of the session, that people will succumb to fear, uncertainty, and confusion related to how we interpret Ra's words, which they explain in one way or another in all the sessions that are linked together. This certainly has been achieved. Right? We are constantly being pulled in one direction or another by both positive and negative catalyst.

If you embrace fear of death OR prophecy, you subject yourself to negative manipulation. Prophecy is how Orion manipulates. If there was no Mayan calendar, I have a hard time believing many of us would be arguing about 2011. If you're influenced by 2011, you must be influenced by prophecy in some small way, even if you don't know it.

To take two perceived contradicting statements and apply different meaning to each indicates subjective reasoning at work. We all do it..but Ra gave us plenty of advice to work with outside of subjectivity. But I don't even think the 2011 statement lacks totally in clarity, it's ambiguous at best, and in post #100 I explain why.

I'm willing to mold and grow my understanding, and consider other possibilities. Suppose Orion didn't influence the channel directly. The purity of the session was detuning, no doubt. Ra simply could be telling both Don and those who read the following, to consider the information you seek, to consider the emotions that negative entities work with, and to consider all the information in the sessions that these dates point to. It seems Don was unsure about the harvest at that point because he was still learning. He too was probably influenced by negative catalyst/concepts, much like we all are. Detuning certainly affects clarity..we can say that for sure because of the errors made.

Look at question 10.5 and the rest of the session where a specific date of 10, 821 was given. Ra is talking about the downfall of Atlantis, which was the result of Atlantis being pulled back towards the negative polarity.

Dates don't have meaning in the Ra material, but all the sessions that do have dates impart philosophy that illuminates how negative catalyst affects us.

That could have been the true message.