Harvest: Do The Math

[unity100]

No need to introduce from your level, or mine, yes. But if something exists in Creation, it exists because it was introduced, or, if you want to split semantic hairs, you could say that it was allowed to exist by the Creator. Imbalance exists, that much you and I can agree on. But the issue of desirability versus undesirability is extremely subjective. What you may desire may repulse me.

In the same vein, you see imbalance as "undesirable," and a loss to the whole. I don't. And I don't think that the Ra complex did either. In fact, they spoke of concepts like "gain" and "loss" very infrequently, and then usually immediately emphasized that they used them because of linguistic limitations and that there was, in fact, no such thing.

So my point is, I think that you are imposing the human value system - your personal version of the human value system, in fact - on a concept that ultimately transcends human appreciation. I don't believe, when discussing concepts like this grand tapestry woven by each of our experiences across multiple planes of existence, that human concepts like desire, attraction, repulsion, etc. are useful or valid, since we don't know from what kind of mindset we will be perceiving said "tapestry" anyway.

imbalance is something that comes out with there being more than one entity existing. see, you have whole, you divide it into infinite multiple parts, and there you have infinitely varied infinite number of parts in their imbalance.

'imposing human value system' is your perception here. you think that i am attributing more or less importance to balance/imbalance. there is nothing as such.

the creation we are in, apparently is seeking balance. whatever you may call the process - unification of creations, balancing of existences, this, that - all is from lesser balance towards greater balance here ; you come from a singular atom and go towards octave density by merging with all the other infinitely small imbalances (other entities) in this universe.

therefore, if you look at it from our narrow perspective of our creation, you may say that we are on the 'balance seeking' side of things.

it is possible that on the other side, something exists that seeks imbalance and dispersion. however, this is not our side.

see, now you have two opposite polarities. the flow is from one side to the other, and on the other side, from one side to other. something like that.

however even this is an imbalance - when these two opposites merge, they create a null-effect union, which can be said as perfectly in balance from our side, and perfectly in imbalance from any potential other side.

however, both would be wrong, since the concept of balance does not pass for this state. and in retrospect, it also is valid at the same time. at that point you have infinity.