09-06-2011, 06:18 PM
(09-06-2011, 05:34 PM)unity100 Wrote:(09-06-2011, 05:30 PM)Richard Wrote: And then...what if Ra was just kidding?
There is nothing that validates anything that Ra has ever said other than the fact that we "like" some of what Ra has imparted. Technically, its just Ra's opinion.
And our decision (or choice, if you will) of what to take to heart...or not.
Richard
the problem here is not about what someone likes, or what is Ra's opinion. the problem here is, basically invalidating everything starting from session 17 because someone didnt like something that was in that session.
Quite simply, IF YOU took the following quote as "valid", none of this would be a "problem" for you....
Quote:61.9 Questioner: This brings out the point of the purpose of the physical incarnation, I believe. And that is to reach a conviction through your own thought processes as to a solution to problems and understandings in a totally free situation with no proof at all or anything that you would consider proof, proof being a very poor word in itself. Can you expand on my concept?
Ra: I am Ra. Your opinion is an eloquent one although somewhat confused in its connections between the freedom expressed by subjective knowing and the freedom expressed by subjective acceptance. There is a significant distinction between the two.
This is not a dimension of knowing, even subjectively, due to the lack of overview of cosmic and other in-pourings which affect each and every situation which produces catalyst. The subjective acceptance of that which is at the moment and the finding of love within that moment is the greater freedom.
That known as the subjective knowing without proof is, in some degree, a poor friend for there will be anomalies no matter how much information is garnered due to the distortions which form third-density