09-05-2011, 05:56 PM
(09-05-2011, 05:42 PM)Icaro Wrote: Ok. I'm willing to use an example of my own instead of answering your pointed questions because they only cause confusion. You are bothered by the statement that Adolf's friends are supposedly waiting to be harvested. I will use that as an example. This pertains to session 35.
Don's first question to Ra is about Franklin Roosevelt. Ra already knows all the questions he's going to ask. So Ra's warning..
Quote:Ra: I am Ra. It is to be noted that in discussing those who are well-known among your peoples there is the possibility that information may be seen to be specific to one entity whereas in actuality the great design of experience is much the same for each entity. It is with this in mind that we would discuss the experiential forces which offered catalyst to an individual.
Three more transitory questions are asked about Roosevelt and Hitler. The session is detuning. The next question..
Quote:Questioner: Thank you. That is an important example I believe. I was wondering if any of those who were subordinate to Adolf at that time were able to polarize in a harvestable nature on the negative path? Ra: I am Ra. We can speak only of two entities who may be harvestable in a negative sense, others still being in the physical incarnation: one known to you as Hermann; the other known, as it preferred to be called, Himmler.
Harvestable in this sentence does not refer to the present tense as Ra has warned in his first response. Ra is saying that 'harvestable' will be taken out of context. Which it has..as is often argued. Because the session is detuning, Ra's clarity is lacking. So those that are interested in transitory and misleading material interpret the question incorrectly. Ra is using known entities as examples, not as fact.
excuse me but you dodged my main question - you proposed that because transitory information was asked, channel was compromised in 17.29.
i told you that this would evaluate it to be compromised in all other points where transitory information was asked.
you have dodged this. and now moving to interpret a singular other quote subjectively.
tell me why the channel would be compromised only on the quotes you have problems with, if asking transitory information compromises a channel in the estimations and speed you propose.
tell me why we should believe that Ra is answering, when it is told that orion entities called out to moses from a flying craft.
tell me why we should believe that Ra is answering, when it is told that rasputin was an adept who harvested itself.
tell me why we should believe that Ra is answering, when it is told that maldek was destroyed by nuclear weapons.