09-05-2011, 01:54 AM
(09-05-2011, 01:12 AM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote:Not convincing in the least for me. Way too much pareidolia to take seriously. In fact, it seems like an unfortunate pathological condition which is greatly reinforced by the public's ongoing need for escapism and victimhood.(09-04-2011, 02:08 PM)zenmaster Wrote: You do realize Hoagland has postulated many, many NASA images as being evidence of artificial construction. The earth's moon, rocks on the moon, Martian moon Phobos, Martian 'walled cities', Martian 'face', Saturn's moon Iapetus. That's 'what he does
I saw Hoagland's entire presentation on the Mars monuments back around 1987 - the 2-hour presentation he did for NASA - as well as read his book - and I'm convinced he's right about it. I don't know about the others, but I believe him about Mars. There's way too much evidence to think otherwise. And, knowing what we know from Ra - that Mars DID host 3D entities - it seems pretty obvious anyway. NASA covered it up. Hoagland predicted they would beforehand, and then they did exactly what he predicted.