09-04-2009, 07:36 PM
(09-04-2009, 03:57 PM)Quantum Wrote: If we are only required a 51% STO to "pass" into graduation, is to the converse the same application of rule applied, that 51% or more of STO influence in a message protected enough by the Guardians who are responsible for quarantine is enough to teach?
(09-04-2009, 05:08 PM)Lavazza Wrote: Hmm, this is indeed an interesting proposal. I'm inclined upon initial thinking that this is probably not the case. For the aspiring 3rd density entity, one could perhaps strive for 100% positive polarity and only actually attain 75%, but their intention is in the right place, and has been proven by the >50% number, and hence graduation is attained. If the entity had been trying for 100% and only gotten as far as 30%, then it would become obvious that the entity was not really trying very hard and is therefore insincere. I am adding a lot of my personal view points to my argument, but I feel it's the intention behind the polarity that counts here.
Hello Lavazza. Great to see you. Thank you for continuing this interesting thread. I condensed my question above to cut out the fat and perhaps clean up the assumption posed. I am wondering if your answer would change based on cleaner verbiage above on my part? To be more precise, and perhaps you did already answer, is 51% of STO information conveyed/taught, although attempted to be given/transmitted at 100% but received as a result of distortion at a mere 51% enough so as to allow it to "pass" or be acceptable as a teaching? If so, then as airwaves offers, if I may paraphrase with humor intended (((
))) maybe she aint the prettiest gal in the room, but she's fine enough to dance with even if I never would marry her.Distortion is an is. It is a 3D principle of law. It can be cleaned up, but alas the blot will always remain to a lessor or greater degree. It will always/must be in 3D for the egg gathering of lessons. As such all teachings, as much as any thing else, will be received through the distortion principle, this through our twisted ears if not our more twisted minds submerged up to and over our eyeballs in 3D. Thus, no teaching received will be at 100% even if transmitted at 100%. It may further even be that it very well is not even taught at 100%? If the premise is true, then the conclusion begs, at what level of a teaching "presented" or "received" is it acceptable, much less passed? Maybe 51% cuts both ways?
Q ... I mean Q....
sorry...just attempting to be safe in the event of any distortion.
Q