08-31-2011, 09:33 PM
(08-31-2011, 07:39 PM)unity100 Wrote: they did not just 'not respond to will it be spread out portion of the query' -> they elaborated on THAT date. ' ....not incarnation at this time ......'.
Possibly. "At this time" could be read as at the time of the transmission, or at the time of harvest. In other words, Ra could have meant that those not incarnation at the time of harvest would be harvested, or that at the time of the channeling there were those not yet incarnated that will be come harvest time.
Actually, this is a GREAT example of how something could be read in more than one interpretation, without having to assign unusual connotations to words, or change them around in the slightest.
This might throw another monkey wrench into the works, but depending upon the true intention of this statement, it may be necessary to be incarnated in order to be harvested.
That would explain this:
34.18 Wrote:Questioner: Do we have enough time for me to ask if the death, almost immediately after the cessation of war, of this entity could have been so that it could have immediately been reincarnated so that it could make harvest?
Ra: I am Ra. This is precisely correct.
In any case, it is interesting looking back through the material on a search for the word "harvest". Surprisingly, most of the queries are directed toward negative harvests, harvests on other planets, or harvests in other densities. There is actually very little to go on regarding our own harvest. Ah, such is life.