Share your vision for the harvest

[Tenet Nosce]

Carla is not Ra.

Oh, but she is! (I just thought I'd say it first)

No, Carla is not Ra. And Ra is not Q'uo. And Q'uo is not Seth. And we are all different people with differing views.

Therefore to even attempt to make such an appeal to authority it could only be made on the basis of where -in the density scheme- a given entity is being observed.

And since we do not have tags floating over our heads saying "3.5D" or "4.2D" or "6.1D", the only reliable indicator of "whose view wins" is the degree of coherence with which a body of information, or a particular interpretation of the information, displays.

Any serious student of the Ra material should have already concluded to a sufficient degree in their own minds that the Ra material is coherent enough to even be considered as a reliable source in the first place. We shouldn't have to rehash these same fundamental arguments every time somebody wants to have a conversation.

If an individual is coming at the material from the perspective that it is not coherent, and that it needs to be held together with all manner of of mental machinations, duct tape, and meat glue, in order to stand on its own two feet, then in my opinion the whole thing is garbage.

If red means blue and apples mean bananas, then the Ra material is just another example of "spiritual" psychobabble and gibberish, of which there are innumerable examples, and there is really no point in discussing it at all. It belongs with Marjory out in the trash heap.

Now it is no skin off of my nose if another person thinks that Ra is completely full of feces. I don't care. My beliefs do not require others to believe in them. But please, don't hide in the shadows, pretending to be a "fan" of the material when in reality you think it is all a bunch of crap, and seek to undermine the ability of others to have an instructive conversation around a portion of the material that you happen to find objectionable and/or ridiculous.