09-01-2009, 05:46 PM
i haven't watched any of his more recent stuff, infact i haven't looked at much that he's done since he launched divine cosmos, but his earlier writings in pulling everything together and interpreting a diverse range of sources i found very valuable. his work since he started divine cosmos does seem more of an ego trip than the material that he collated when he had the ascension2000 site
i see him now as mainly an entry point for the LOO - and he does that job admirably - certainly his forum membership shot up very quickly once he started doing more public stuff. i suspect a lot of people new to this kind of information will be initially drawn to him because of the more outlandish claims, and some of them will then discover and resonate with the LOO. tbh if you've already discovered the LOO then you're probably not david's target audience if that makse sense?
i see him now as mainly an entry point for the LOO - and he does that job admirably - certainly his forum membership shot up very quickly once he started doing more public stuff. i suspect a lot of people new to this kind of information will be initially drawn to him because of the more outlandish claims, and some of them will then discover and resonate with the LOO. tbh if you've already discovered the LOO then you're probably not david's target audience if that makse sense?