08-21-2009, 05:22 PM
(08-21-2009, 04:14 PM)3D Sunset Wrote: Hello again Q! I do so enjoy communing with you again. All that I would add to what has already been said, is to point out that the Ohaspe material was consciously channeled by an entity working in isolation. As such, there is no telling how the message was garbled as it filtered trough the instrument's conscious mind. I doubt seriously that the material was received as it was transmitted, but certainly nothing would have made it through the instruments own free will filters, as it were. I think that it is just as likely that it was omitted by the Confederation source (in order for it to be acceptable to a broader western audience), than that it was filtered by the receiving instrument.
The feeling is quite mutual 3D. Thank you for both your private and public proddings as well dear friend. As always 3D, your postulate above is a most interesting one. You have a wonderful way of seeking out the middle path in understanding. I then by this reckoning might assume you to mean that the Confederation would potentially have had it otherwise, by assuming further that were it completely within their purview that they would have possibly included all that was perhaps filtered out by and through the author, this according to his subconscious enculturation?
Interesting if I am understanding your meaning. It begs the question then: When does the Confederation pass a given material? Before the fact, as in 'does this author seem to be in alignment with LOO principles, and as such we pass the transmission of said material', or 'after the fact, as in when the material has been completed? If before, one can surmise that it might have barely passed as compared to after, this as is the course in the truer sense of a book review. If after, then perhaps only so much as it makes a point, but clearly a very disturbingly garbled and distorted one. Not to be facetious or pedantic, but this passing and not passing principle then leaves much to be desired. God forbid, as the resident heretic I protest I am not that I might be viewed as nonetheless that I might unbeknownst be that I refute as I perhaps agree, that I dare to question the Confederation principles if this is so. Here we go again as a principle to understanding: question everything. Clearly its a rhetorical question, but how then might such a material pass which is so starkly in contrast to at least very core and central beliefs to certain and particular principles of the LOO, namely in this case polarity? The passing of it causes more confusion to the LOO in principle (certainly and unquestionably as taught by Ra) than it does clarity to it if you see my point. The fact that Ra shared that it passed must be accepted if we are to accept Ra at all. Unless we are to also accept that only a mere 51% truth in polarity is as good as is 51% in polarity to individuated graduation. That would be sad if true. But alas, it may speculatively indeed be as true, for what is truth if its primary purpose is to arrive at a nominal 51% graduation?
I leave you with another can of worms, albeit extremely packed rich, fortified, and high in protein...
Q