Guardians from the Octave above

[unity100]

actually, even from the starters, concept of 'one' is only something that has a meaning when there is many. without many there is no 'one', with 'one' there cant be many.

Would it be safe to say that you disagree with the Law of One as given by Ra? Not the bulk of the material, necessarily, but the actual law itself?

'Law of One' as in 'one' seems to signify that everything comes from the same source, or everything is unified. however, this seems to be based on a proposition of an actual quantity -> nomatter how you look at it, proposing that infinity is 'one' (single) because 'there cant be another infinity' is a direct contradiction. foremost, being 'single' is something that is a quantifier and only meaningful in the presence of many (you can say that there being many, makes there being single, possible).

but more importantly, the moment you are able to attribute an adjective/identifier to infinity, it stops being infinite. to be infinite, infinity has to be comprised of both the identifier you are attributing to it, and also its counterpart, so that nothing will be missing from infinity. being 'one' means that it is missing being 'many'. for infinity both must hold equally.

therefore, no attribution or justification or anything can be made over infinity. this makes basing any kind of law, leave aside Law of One on infinity, impossible -> whatever you propose, the opposite will also be true.

if we go down to the infinite intelligence level, the proposition of 'one' may have a chance. since at this point, there is potential, differentiation (intelligent infinity is not infinity), and there can be a proposition of any quantifiers and differentiations.

but. infinite intelligence is in itself only a level below infinity, so it is right before the point where any kind of attribution becomes meaningless. it is rather debatable that it is possible to attribute a singularity to infinite intelligence.

the moment we go down to the creator level, ie, the principle that causes the first central sun to be born, such proposition becomes possible. but then again, since infinity is infinite, the proposition of such a 'one central sun' becomes questionable too (in infinity the opposite must also be true).

but it is possible to propose that, there has been one central sun (the first logos) and a single creator in our existence/creation. (not only this octave). the question of at which point we start to merging with another existence/creation, to complete each other, is a different question. (however it will probably be near the point 'creator').

so, as you can see, the question is neither an easy question, nor does it have a simple answer. however, it is horizon-widening.