(06-29-2011, 10:16 PM)abridgetoofar Wrote:I'd say that it splits apart in our 'time'. Our 'time' is durational, linear, causal, or sequenced. And our 'knowledge' is constructed from this same 3D-mechanical limitation. But this is necessarily very different than an overview of time that is not subject to the limitations of event sequencing.(06-29-2011, 09:43 PM)zenmaster Wrote:(06-29-2011, 09:29 PM)abridgetoofar Wrote:What I mean is, isn't this knowledge of creation, extant with creation?(06-29-2011, 09:19 PM)zenmaster Wrote:(06-29-2011, 09:04 PM)abridgetoofar Wrote: Must it have? If the Creator knows every little thing there is to know before it is experienced, what's the point of experiencing?If we experience it in durational-bounded terms and the creator experiences it outside of that, the point would be the same, right?.
Within this octave, did the Logoi have knowledge of an STS polarity before an entity discovered it? Wasn't the creator One with itself before this octave? What would be the point of starting the octave if it already knew what was going to happen?
I think I understood what you mean, my questions were more legitimate questions than points.
Ra says that creation is cyclical in nature (or they assume so), so when a cycle ends and the creator is One, what would be the point of splitting apart again if all of this knowledge were already known to the One?
(06-29-2011, 10:16 PM)abridgetoofar Wrote: Potential is infinite, but is it known before it is experienced?It is known now. If it's one, it's one in time. It is happening now - the experience may lead or follow depending on affinity to the principles that make up the subject/object of experience. i.e.:
Quote:16.49 Questioner: To make this a little more clear, if I were to daydream strongly about building a ship, would this occur in one of these other densities?
Ra: I am Ra. This would/would have/or shall occur.
(06-29-2011, 10:16 PM)abridgetoofar Wrote: Getting back to the base question, was the STS polarity an acknowledged potential before it actually happened? Did the Logos which contained the first STS entity know that STS was possible, or more specifically, was it planned by that Logos?My understanding is that this is the design happening simultaneously with the designers idea. We have all of this space to appreciate its many facets and in so doing we co-create that experience. We don't experience it 'after the fact'.
(06-29-2011, 10:16 PM)abridgetoofar Wrote:Just wondering why you thought green ray was a way to contact intelligent infinity. We are talking about 3D to 4D transition, correct? Apparently, its somewhat conscious use via STO choice merely makes one harvestable to green-ray environment. On the other hand, the 95% STS entity will indeed use intelligent infinity (as a requirement) for harvest. So there is a big difference in mechanics and I think it's a mistake to not only say steps are skipped but that the G2II is opened the same way with green.Quote: Why do you say STO is doing the same with green?
"15.12: ...The center of heart, or green-ray, is the center from which third-density beings may springboard, shall we say, to infinite intelligence."
Indigo being the gateway to intelligent infinity, STS using orange/yellow to reach indigo, STO using green. There are other references which I draw this understanding from if you want me to find them.