Fukusjima

[Monica]

you are forgetting that choice, what determines sto/sts, is related to yellow ray. and at the end of that ray's density, the choice is determined.

I'm not forgetting that. That doesn't mean we only need 1% green to be harvestable. I am curious which quotes have led you to that conclusion. Choice is only the first step. Choice must be continually reinforced, with power multiplied each time. That is what opens green. Choice comes from yellow, but cause opening of green. It is the opening of green that determines harvestability, not the initial choice.

the behavior you have expressed can not be shown as something pertaining and natural to this d, leave aside the harvest.

It was offered only as an analogy to this d.

True, the mechanics of each density aren't necessarily the same as of other densities. But my analogy was only to illustrate a point.

was it designed ? i didnt see anything in regard to that in Ra material. it may be from other sources.

I don't recall anything specifically about the design of family, but it seems like common sense to me, that family structures would help facilitate the learning of love, for those entities who failed to learn it before. And yes, other sources do support this also.

we are talking about base mechanics of existence, like action-reaction, light traveling in a straight line and so on. intention is not a factor in these. intention can be a factor in the interactions of entities with each other.

Friend, you and I both know from previous conversations, that this is an area we disagree in. I don't see these mechanisms as separate from consciousness. Rather, they are designed for the very purpose of evolving consciousness. Thus, in my view, consciousness cannot be separated from any 'mechanic.'

We've been over this ground, so I'll leave it at that.

a good example is despite being totally isolated from the effects of what he did, and its intentions great, the entity walking in to abraham lincoln to facilitate emancipation losing some polarity due to entities losing their lives in the civil war.

I have no conflict with that, as far as it fitting into my view.

its a simple principle - every action has a reaction.

I agree with that. However, in my view, it isn't limited to just physical/mechanical actions. Each thought, each intention, is also an action, generating its own reactions.

yes it will.

OK thank you. I felt that this was an important point.