06-21-2011, 09:21 AM
(06-20-2011, 10:37 PM)βαθμιαίος Wrote: Seems like kind of the long way around the bush compared to "[t]hus the one intelligent infinity invested itself in an exploration of many-ness."
nay. for the above sentence is lacking in meaning. the intelligent infinity is not 'one'. it is also many.
Quote:(06-20-2011, 10:20 PM)111 Wrote: Dosent Ra say that they key to completing this density is to realize and admit that we don't understand?
Yup.
16.37 Questioner: I am assuming that it is not necessary for an individual to understand the Law of One to go from the third to the fourth density. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. It is absolutely necessary that an entity consciously realize it does not understand in order for it to be harvestable. Understanding is not of this density.
some of you people are hell bent on not understanding even if you are able to understand.
one should remember two things regarding this subject
- law of responsibility
- not everyone's lessons are the lesson of choicemaking in 3d.
there is little to gain for a 3d entity from Ra material. those entities who are making the choice, are in need of making that choice spiritually, and they are busy with the lessons with their other selves as this planetary nexus offers.
the ones who are almost qualified, but having been blocked by mental biases they need to clear by consuming advanced information like this, would not be many. in fact, including wanderers, ra estimated that 362,000 planet-wide, was calling for the information they were giving. and in wanderer awakening percentage talk, they mentioned that this information would make sense to first 2 percentage groups.
even if there are 3d entities needing to consume this kind of information to clear their mental bias for facilitating their choice, this will not happen with them not choosing to understand what they learn. in such a situation, the entity would need to learn why, and understand how, so that its mental biases could be cleared.
..........
in short - if you dont want to understand 'the one' (or whatever you are naming infinite intelligence), then dont. it is contradictory to participate in a forum that is for discussing and understanding that 'one', to say that you shouldnt.
why would someone be here discussing in the first place, if s/he doesnt want to understand ...