06-20-2011, 09:10 PM
I love the pace of your posts, Azrael.
Many perspectives applied to a single thought. May I throw some more into the pot? If you reach a level of green love, why would you not stay and become a wanderer? How could the expression of love leave anyone behind? So what is moving on? What is progression? Are we really doing progression or is it just the way our energy moves? If my future self is a "progressed" self, then is it not my future self that performed progression and not me, because I need to be me as I am now in order for that future to be able to exist. So, what is progression? How could it possibly be different than non-progression? If I am doing what I am being right now, and all of my time/space Me is supported from my being, then this is not right and not wrong. We think we need to do what we think we need to do, and our thinking of our being is the doing of our being
Ra was speaking to a 3D illusion that can't understand further concepts of linear time- past present future.
"Simultaneous" is soon to become a semantic issue.
Ra says "simultaneous" isn't precise because our understanding of the word is time based. When I think of "simultaneous", I reconstruct the term to refer to the non-understanding I have with the idea that all is One and is a thought "happening simultaneously." Again, not by the definition, but by the abstract idea.
Many perspectives applied to a single thought. May I throw some more into the pot? If you reach a level of green love, why would you not stay and become a wanderer? How could the expression of love leave anyone behind? So what is moving on? What is progression? Are we really doing progression or is it just the way our energy moves? If my future self is a "progressed" self, then is it not my future self that performed progression and not me, because I need to be me as I am now in order for that future to be able to exist. So, what is progression? How could it possibly be different than non-progression? If I am doing what I am being right now, and all of my time/space Me is supported from my being, then this is not right and not wrong. We think we need to do what we think we need to do, and our thinking of our being is the doing of our being
(06-20-2011, 09:00 PM)unity100 Wrote:(06-20-2011, 07:53 PM)Azrael Wrote: This all breaks down when I consider that all time is simultaneous.
all time is not simultaneous in 3d vicinity and closer. it may be simultaneous later as densities go by, and timeless in 7d. but time exists in 3d. at least, ra says there is a past and future in 3d.
Ra was speaking to a 3D illusion that can't understand further concepts of linear time- past present future.
"Simultaneous" is soon to become a semantic issue.
Ra says "simultaneous" isn't precise because our understanding of the word is time based. When I think of "simultaneous", I reconstruct the term to refer to the non-understanding I have with the idea that all is One and is a thought "happening simultaneously." Again, not by the definition, but by the abstract idea.