06-14-2011, 07:38 AM
(06-13-2011, 07:39 PM)Azrael Wrote: Man, Unity, look at your words, you've got a lot of ego going on. That's great you have rationalizations and explanations, but I in no way see this as a requirement for validity. Certainly, it is useful for you to reconcile it with your own preconceptions about reality, but you really are preaching still. Even religious zealots provide their own rationalizations and explanations. I see you using the "established" view as a fulcrum from which to exude your "authority".
Not that I deny you the right and truth of your knowledge, but your pressure is noxious.
did i say what i was saying was valid because i was providing rationalizations ? doesnt my bright blue signature catch your attention ?
and now it ended up as 'ego' to demand rationalization and explanation for something someone is telling as truth. like '4d bodies are manufactured in saturn's rings'.
excuse me. i wont discuss it in detail or lengthen this talk further - it isnt ego to ask rationalizations in a discussion.
it isnt ego to talk on and on on a subject by providing your reasons and logic while telling your perspective.
it is called 'discussion'.
(06-13-2011, 09:09 PM)abridgetoofar Wrote:(06-13-2011, 07:34 PM)unity100 Wrote: a situation in which people are slinging around such terminologies, and others reinterpreting them to the extreme and making those terminologies and logic fit in their mind by themselves, would be like a situation in which a group of monkeys talking to each other without really understanding what others are saying, but all believing that they are actually talking and understanding each other.
What's even better than the meaning behind this analogy is the hilarious imagery.
it was actually going to include monkeys' butts, but i held back, out of respect for the elderly.
(06-14-2011, 04:35 AM)Namaste Wrote: The reason I'm re-iterating this is simple; a crux of positive polarisation (and the evolution of our species) is that we accept each other, without having to repeatedly question (past another's comfort levels) until the person either changes their beliefs to your own, or leaves. That is far from the message Ra offers. It's not about the technicalities. Technicalities I might add, that no one here can prove, at all. The only thing one can prove/measure (at this time) is how one acts towards another. This is where efforts should be made if one is wishing to polarise positively and help this planet evolve. It's not about my beliefs vs. your beliefs (even on this forum), it's about my beliefs AND your beliefs.
Peace and love, brothers and sisters :¬)
the particular problem here, is that we are here for information too.
and in that regard, someone saying that, say, s/he is coming from 4 octaves above and giving us a lot of 'facts' about how things go around in universe ...
............
i really dont know what we are discussing at all.
accepting what someone else says without weighing it first and asking for proof is NOT love.
its foolery. you are not accepting the PERSON with that act. you are accepting what the person SAYS. there is a mountain of difference in between the two.