06-13-2011, 09:04 PM
(06-13-2011, 07:34 PM)unity100 Wrote:(06-13-2011, 07:12 PM)111 Wrote: And I feel in the same regards you Preach your views of the Law of One. And you defend your beliefs vigorously.
and in case you havent noticed, i am open to providing references AND rationalizations for ALL of what i say, leave aside the ones that contradict Ra material.
some, dont like to do that.
Quote:I found the discussion entertaining. That dosent mean I have to feel it was handled with respect. In a since the "christ coinsiousness" is the "Lord" of a 4d sphere. To someone with a diffrent terminology and perspective they may misinterprate this info being preceived.
well then excuse me but, it is the 'preacher's task to be aware of his/her terminological difference, and explain it to others. everyone else is not bound to know and talk in others' terminologies. when someone asks, you provide your terminology.
he didnt provide any explanation like you provide by interpreting 'lord of this planet' as 'christ consciousness' or anything. you are providing that in your behalf in your mind yourself, and then judging disrespect with your presupposition.
a situation in which people are slinging around such terminologies, and others reinterpreting them to the extreme and making those terminologies and logic fit in their mind by themselves, would be like a situation in which a group of monkeys talking to each other without really understanding what others are saying, but all believing that they are actually talking and understanding each other.
Namaste brother