(06-13-2011, 07:24 AM)unity100 Wrote:(06-13-2011, 07:02 AM)Namaste Wrote: Many should's and should not's in there :¬)
most unfortunately, or, maybe actually fortunately, there are should's and should not's in existence.
just like how Carla should not have taken lsd back while channeling Ra, if she wanted to continue Ra contact, and had done so.
there are shoulds and should nots, if you are walking in a particular direction. you are free to do anything as per free will - but, walking in a particular direction requires not walking in other directions.
Yes, this was the essence of my point, these are Raman's truths, chosen through free will. Expecting others to hold the same viewpoint is not how Creation works :¬)
(06-13-2011, 07:24 AM)unity100 Wrote:Quote:It's nice to see the passion about how the world needs to change; global inequality is the cause of much suffering. Translated into action, that passion can become a very powerful aid to others. Without action, it can ultimately become a resentful (and hence negative) contribution (energetically).
there is a level at which the situation is actionable.
imagine you were expending the above words just months before maldek's destruction.
Quote:From another perspective, there is a bigger picture with regards to the experience of an eternal soul. Some may have indeed chosen these lives. In an infinite universe, a soul will experience both the dark (fear) and the light (love) in which to become balanced and hence align closer to the original thought. Who are we to say that suffering is wrong? Suffering is part of Creation. Simple logic implies that one then labels Creation as 'wrong', which is not coherent with positive polarisation (unconditional love/acceptance for all - including circumstances you would rather be without).
lets back to the lsd example.
taking of lsd in spite of continuing Ra contact is only useful and valid for learning NOT to take lsd if one wants to continue Ra contact.
similarly, causing a planet to undergo a catastrophe is only useful for teaching not to allow planets to destroy themselves.
correction - not to allow haywire children populations to destroy planets.
Quote:Perhaps the opposite of what you say may be true. Not accepting an aspect of Creation could indicate you are not ready for harvest, as your love becomes conditional. Food for thought :¬)
it has been quite intriguing for me as well.
Quote:Along with B, I am under the impression that an instantaneous change is possible. Our experience is, after all, based on energy (waves). They could change within an instant, which would in turn effect the 'physical' structure produced/manifested.
instantaneous change as in people suddenly lighting up and saying 'oooh', i dont think so.
if it was possible, there wouldnt be any mixed harvests.
We exist in an infinite Creation, everything is possible, and in fact, one may go further to deduce that due to this, there has to be experiences where instant 'enlightenment' happens. Whether it happens in this reality is another thing, one I do not claim to have the answer to, rather open to the possibility.