05-12-2011, 06:58 AM
(05-12-2011, 12:43 AM)unity100 Wrote: now, we are yet to see your reasoning, for lack of such a link in between mayan calendar, which tracks cycles of the sun, and Ra material, which says the approach of green density is like tickings of a clock, and harvest will happen at 2011.If you've looked into the subject, you'd see that Calleman stands quite alone in his scholarly interpretation, as a 'Mayanist', of the calendar - as he is alone in his social, political, and economic predictions. That his, his interpretations are criticized and rejected by his colleagues. Now this does not mean he is 'wrong', as you might interpret. However, in other words, Calleman's (impressionable) ideas are not magically equivalent to the Mayan calendar, by mere association or, for that matter, some desire to link the date of October 2011 with the approximate date from Don in the Ra Material. And really, that's all we have to begin to work with here, a willingness and desire to link things using his framework (as he himself has done prolifically and with poor track record) and a vague notion of what harvest means. Not quite hopeless, but then this is an entirely subjective exercise which naturally falls out of the bounds of justification.
mayan calendar doesnt belong to calleman or anyone else. and mayan calendar's all cycles end at 18 oct 2011.
My interpretation of 'Harvest', for what its worth, is that it is indeed a space/time (localized) condition that allows for the direction of density-based incarnational needs (which body is activated, where is the learning opportunity) after death. As we can die at any time (by random events), "There is not at this time any reason to include efforts along these distortions toward longevity". So I agree that it's a discrete event, after death. The 100-700 year transitional period I posit is simply due to an unknown human lifespan, combined with the influences of 3rd and 4th density creative thought.