Quite interesting - Mayan day/nights and earth periods

[unity100]

But basically, I do not read anything with which to 'argue'. I see the usual gut feelings, intuitions, convenient correlations, and other vagaries of the imagination. This is mingled in with personal hopes, etc. It's like poetry. You don't 'argue' with poetry - you 'resonate' with it. You don't argue with someone that says they see a unicorn in a cloud formation. You might nod your head and think, 'yeah, I can see how that may appear that way'. Rather, you might 'argue' with things that have some philosophical foundation for example, and only then if someone wasn't personally invested in their ideas. If someone says 'that is God', who am I to 'argue'. Just doesn't work that way. Like ramen and his Dewey Larson / mainstream science dichotomy - you just know there is nothing there with which to debate (also rather non sequitur to this topic). But there is a 'vacuum of expectation created and maintained' for an argumentative reaction, for some reason.

hopes schmopes, this that, unicorn cloud formation etc etc.

i asked you this :

17.29 Questioner: Am I to understand that the harvest is to occur in the year 2011, or will it be spread out?

Ra: I am Ra. This is an approximation. We have stated we have difficulty with your time/space. This is an appropriate probable/possible time/space nexus for harvest. Those who are not in incarnation at this time will be included in the harvest.

http://lawofone.info/results.php?session...=1&ss=1#29

so, in short, you are ACCEPTING that, harvest will happen in year 2011 then ?